Britain to invade Ecuador?

News and current events discussion

Britain to invade Ecuador?

Unread postby Yurtles » 16 Aug 12, 11:27 am

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/16/world ... &ref=world

So Ecuador announced they're going to give Julian Assange asylum and then Britain sent Ecuador a letter basically telling them that if they don't give up Julian they're going to come in and get him. All because the police want him to answer some questions. In Sweden.

Right now there's a couple van-loads of police hanging around the embassy and some policemen inside doing something. Probably at this stage asking really nicely if Julian would like to come outside because it's such a nice day.

"Disproportionate" is the word that comes to mind.
BorisBC wrote:Pro tip - if you have to spew in a car, spew down the (inside) front of your shirt. Trust me, it's a lot easier to clean spew off yourself than the interior of a car.
Yurtles

User avatar
Story Teller
 
Offline
Posts: 1900
Joined: 20 Feb 09, 2:30 pm

Britain to invade Ecuador?

Unread postby Dean » 16 Aug 12, 12:16 pm

The topic is mildly misleading IMO

I very much doubt tacit consent was given for the embassy search, but I can't really see what other options they had.

My knowledge of the legislation used to enter the embassy is limited to what I've read in the media. Having said that, the search doesn't really seem to match the spirit of the legislation.

Edit : my post may have been premature!
Image
Dean

BF Admin
 
Offline
Posts: 1499
Joined: 12 Nov 07, 3:03 pm
Location: Melbourne

Re: Britain to invade Ecuador?

Unread postby Ralph Wiggum » 16 Aug 12, 7:56 pm

I really can't foresee Britain raiding the Ecuadorian embassy...the fallout would be waayy to big and Assange isn't worth the international fallout which would follow. Withdrawing the embassy's diplomatic status is more likely though I also see that unlikely. Easiest way to grab him would be if and when he is enroute to the airport. Even diplomats have to go through customs so he is either trapped like a rat or they would have to sneak him out.
Ralph Wiggum

User avatar
Forgotten What The Sky Looks Like
 
Online
Posts: 2266
Joined: 21 Mar 05, 11:59 pm
Location: Standing on top of the 20th Century Fox logo

Re: Britain to invade Ecuador?

Unread postby FryzieDelta » 19 Aug 12, 6:13 pm

They should just go in and take him. It's only Ecuador, what are they gonna do about it :lol:

Wasn't he going to give some speach outside the embassy today? The could just grab him then.
FryzieDelta

1337 p0st3r
 
Offline
Posts: 1287
Joined: 4 Nov 07, 3:34 pm
Location: The Edge

Re: Britain to invade Ecuador?

Unread postby skitzor » 19 Aug 12, 11:40 pm

FryzieDelta wrote:They should just go in and take him. It's only Ecuador, what are they gonna do about it :lol:

nothing, but the international community wouldn't be too happy. russia have already weighed in and basically told britain to be careful about what it does.
Image
skitzor

User avatar
Forgotten What The Sky Looks Like
 
Offline
Posts: 2777
Joined: 1 May 03, 3:10 pm
Location: snapping necks and cashing cheques

Re: Britain to invade Ecuador?

Unread postby Nekosan » 20 Aug 12, 12:58 pm

FryzieDelta wrote:They should just go in and take him. It's only Ecuador, what are they gonna do about it :lol:

Wasn't he going to give some speach outside the embassy today? The could just grab him then.


He was on a balcony.

Breach sovereign territory of another country like that to abduct someone in their care and you open your own embassies up to the same treatment by other foreign powers, any country could then enter Britain's embassies to recapture sheltered dissidents etc and they couldn't say a damn thing.
Nekosan

User avatar
Offline? What's 'offline'?
 
Online
Posts: 3394
Joined: 3 Jan 06, 6:23 pm

Re: Britain to invade Ecuador?

Unread postby diamondd » 20 Aug 12, 1:49 pm

its such a ridiculous situation, he obviously needs to go to Sweden to face those charges but personally I'm happy for him to stay at the Ecuadorian embassy so the stupid fcuking American's don't get him.
diamondd

User avatar
Forgotten What The Sky Looks Like
 
Offline
Posts: 2554
Joined: 23 Sep 08, 7:12 pm

Re: Britain to invade Ecuador?

Unread postby Capt.no0b » 20 Aug 12, 1:55 pm

It looks like he's going to be there for a while, unless he wants to tunnel out.. :lol:
Capt.no0b

User avatar
Padawan
 
Offline
Posts: 457
Joined: 22 Nov 04, 3:20 pm
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Re: Britain to invade Ecuador?

Unread postby MaddMoose » 20 Aug 12, 2:04 pm

Good work on falling for Ecuadoran propaganda. The UK never said that, it was merely stayed that they could remove diplomatic rights to the embassy but have no intention of doing so. It was the Ecuadorians that made up the story about the raid.
Si vis pacem, para bellum
Image
MaddMoose

User avatar
Forgotten What The Sky Looks Like
 
Offline
Posts: 2339
Joined: 25 Nov 08, 11:41 am
Location: Adelaide

Re: Britain to invade Ecuador?

Unread postby Kremmen » 20 Aug 12, 3:19 pm

I don't think Sweden are really look at prosecuting him, Ecuador offered the Swedish police to come in and question in the embassy, they also offered to set up something like a web cam to ask questions, both offers where declined.

Cant recall correctly which article I read for that information, I will look for a source however
A polititian is a fellow who will lay down your life for his country

Texas Guinan
Kremmen

User avatar
Padawan
 
Offline
Posts: 217
Joined: 18 Oct 10, 2:32 pm
Location: Cairns

Re: Britain to invade Ecuador?

Unread postby FryzieDelta » 20 Aug 12, 3:53 pm

skitzor wrote:russia have already weighed in and basically told britain to be careful about what it does.


Russia is a dick. So are China and America, but I'm pissed off at Russia this week. They couldn't do much about Britain going into an embassy in their own country anyway beyond frowning heavily at them.
FryzieDelta

1337 p0st3r
 
Offline
Posts: 1287
Joined: 4 Nov 07, 3:34 pm
Location: The Edge

Re: Britain to invade Ecuador?

Unread postby Mekon » 20 Aug 12, 4:48 pm

MaddMoose wrote:Good work on falling for Ecuadoran propaganda. The UK never said that, it was merely stayed that they could remove diplomatic rights to the embassy but have no intention of doing so. It was the Ecuadorians that made up the story about the raid.

Um, dude... you might want to think about whose propaganda you're prepared to believe.

Ecuador released the letter which was sent to them from British Foreign Office (via an embassy official in Quito). It read, verbatim:

You need to be aware that there is a legal base in the UK, the Diplomatic and Consular Premises Act 1987, that would allow us to take actions in order to arrest Mr Assange in the current premises of the Embassy.

We sincerely hope that we do not reach that point, but if you are not capable of resolving this matter of Mr Assange's presence in your premises, this is an open option for us.

(...)

We need to reiterate that we consider the continued use of the diplomatic premises in this way incompatible with the Vienna Convention and unsustainable and we have made clear the serious implications that this has for our diplomatic relations.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree ... sfeed=true

If they never had any intention of following through, why make the threat in the first place? This letter was never disowned by the British, they just downplayed it:

A spokesman said Britain had merely sought to "clarify its position", according to international law.

"Throughout this process we have drawn the Ecuadoreans' attention to relevant provisions of our law – for example, the extensive human rights safeguards in our extradition procedures, or the legal status of diplomatic premises in the UK," a spokesman said.

"We are still committed to reaching a mutually acceptable solution."

http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2012/au ... ssy-asylum


For what it's worth, the British don't actually officially recognise diplomatic asylum (in fact, it's not even considered a part of International Law), it's more prevalent in South America... although the USA has played with the concept at times.
Image
Mekon

User avatar
I Draw Sustenance From Destroying Your Hyperbole
 
Offline
Posts: 7573
Joined: 8 Dec 03, 6:31 pm
Location: Dysney.Oz

Re: Britain to invade Ecuador?

Unread postby skitzor » 20 Aug 12, 5:29 pm

FryzieDelta wrote:Russia is a dick. So are China and America, but I'm pissed off at Russia this week. They couldn't do much about Britain going into an embassy in their own country anyway beyond frowning heavily at them.

or they could just decide that because Britain don't follow the rules, they don't need to either. chances are Russia will, at some point, want someone in a British embassy.

the only reason countries like Britain and America can break rules they expect everyone else to follow is because they are international powers. Russia doesn't have a power problem.

diamondd wrote:its such a ridiculous situation, he obviously needs to go to Sweden to face those charges but personally I'm happy for him to stay at the Ecuadorian embassy so the stupid fcuking American's don't get him.

I think the issue is that most people don't really see this as being about the charges in Sweden. I remember hearing about something relatively official that hinted at the same thing.
Image
skitzor

User avatar
Forgotten What The Sky Looks Like
 
Offline
Posts: 2777
Joined: 1 May 03, 3:10 pm
Location: snapping necks and cashing cheques

Re: Britain to invade Ecuador?

Unread postby diamondd » 20 Aug 12, 6:48 pm

skitzor wrote:
diamondd wrote:its such a ridiculous situation, he obviously needs to go to Sweden to face those charges but personally I'm happy for him to stay at the Ecuadorian embassy so the stupid fcuking American's don't get him.

I think the issue is that most people don't really see this as being about the charges in Sweden. I remember hearing about something relatively official that hinted at the same thing.

yeah that's my point, the only reason "they" want him out of the Ecuadorian embassy is so that the US can eventually get their hands on him and burn him at the stake. For the UK to be acting so ridiculously they must (IMO) have a big made in America rod up their arse.

what I was trying to say is that while its unfortunate he's "getting out of" facing charges in Sweden, which I believe he definitely should have to answer to, for the time being its better than being extradited to the United States for unjust reasons.
diamondd

User avatar
Forgotten What The Sky Looks Like
 
Offline
Posts: 2554
Joined: 23 Sep 08, 7:12 pm

Re: Britain to invade Ecuador?

Unread postby Kremmen » 20 Aug 12, 7:08 pm

Found that link I was after
Ecuador's foreign minister says he has been told unofficially that Swedish officials have not accepted his country's offer to let them question WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange at Ecuador's embassy in London.
Foreign Minister Ricardo Patino says in a statement released Wednesday that Sweden declined the offer to question Assange in person or via video conference.

http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/story/2012-08-01/assange-wikileaks-ecuador/56669276/1

Just to show honesty and fairness
Murder Suspect questioned in Serbia

Vaksalagatan. Swedish police and prosecutors are now questioning the 21-year-old man from Uppsala, which is being held in Belgrade on suspicion of murdering a 26-year-old in an apartment on Vaksalagatan Christmas.

http://www.reddit.com/r/WikiLeaks/comments/ygngg/swedish_police_and_prosecutors_traveled_to/

Sweden to Serbia 2,627.4 km
Sweden to London 1,999.5 km
A polititian is a fellow who will lay down your life for his country

Texas Guinan
Kremmen

User avatar
Padawan
 
Offline
Posts: 217
Joined: 18 Oct 10, 2:32 pm
Location: Cairns

Next

Return to Current Events

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Makena, Onyx and 2 guests

x

#{title}

#{text}