Matty wrote:A friend of mine hasn't been online in over 2 days due to net issues. So everyone always being connected all the time is an exaggeration.
Saying people who aren't online make up any significant amount is an exaggeration.
Moderator: Content Admins
Matty wrote:A friend of mine hasn't been online in over 2 days due to net issues. So everyone always being connected all the time is an exaggeration.
MaddMoose wrote:Matty wrote:A friend of mine hasn't been online in over 2 days due to net issues. So everyone always being connected all the time is an exaggeration.
Saying people who aren't online make up any significant amount is an exaggeration.
MaddMoose wrote:Matty wrote:A friend of mine hasn't been online in over 2 days due to net issues. So everyone always being connected all the time is an exaggeration.
Saying people who aren't online make up any significant amount is an exaggeration.
vcatkiller wrote:So because Mr EA Exec and friends live in a capital city where there's no excuse for not having an internet connection it means everybody in the universe has an internet connection? Nice.
Mythor wrote:They've made their plans clear in this regard from the very beginning so... don't like it? Don't buy it. You needn't bother looking into any more SimCity information as they're building it from the ground up to take advantage of an internet connection.
There. I just saved a bunch of time for a lot of you. You're welcome.

Marius wrote:If you don't have a stable net connection, how do you manage to get onto the forums in time to complain about every old game franchise dying?
I really do get that some people may have legitimate grounds for complaint. But those with stable net who also complain really don't have much to stand on.
caitsith01 wrote:Except maybe that they don't want to be at the mercy of a games company as to whether they are allowed to pay a game they've paid for? Which has nothing to do with a stable internet connection.
Maybe EA should go free to play if they want to continue to control the use of their games after they are distributed to end users.

Marius wrote:caitsith01 wrote:Except maybe that they don't want to be at the mercy of a games company as to whether they are allowed to pay a game they've paid for? Which has nothing to do with a stable internet connection.
Maybe EA should go free to play if they want to continue to control the use of their games after they are distributed to end users.
But you haven't paid for the entire game... you've paid for the client... half of what's needed to run a client-server online game.
Well if you think about it the US of A probably has a better developed internet infrastructure, and their main market group would probably have reliable internetz.vcatkiller wrote:It's kind of pointless arguing with these type of people. Unless you live in a regional area where the internet is flakey at best you can just assume that everybody has instant on-tap internet connection all the time. I work at a computer store where the people who come in are usually flat out getting a wireless broadband connection, and have zero access to the nice stuff like ADSL. You could argue for satellite but it's kind of flaky too.
So because Mr EA Exec and friends live in a capital city where there's no excuse for not having an internet connection it means everybody in the universe has an internet connection? Nice.
nit3hunt3r wrote:Tho you're right that they shouldn't assume everyone has reliable internetz, but from their (financial) POV peeps without reliable internetz is probably almost non-existent.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests