by hunterkiller » 25 Mar 12, 1:31 pm
Yeah i think i agree with some of the people who said BC2 was more rewarding.
It wasnt until i read those posts that made me think about BC2 and how the game played compared to BF3 and i think i had a better gaming experience with BC2 than i do with BF3.
I think the guns in BC2 were more evenly balanced compared to BF3 where you mainly see a shotty with FRAG and the underslung grenades and thats it, id hate to see the DLC with said guns especially.
It will be interesting to see how the game plays after the update though i just hope it doesnt break it more than what they did with BF2 after the 1.2 patch.
The single most frustrating thing for me about BF3 is the Engineer class, its basically useless against vehicles unless you have a designator spotter with soflam, its only good to kill infantry with the rockets and takes forever to take down any vehicle.
Now i loved Engineer in BF2 and in BC2 and i did really well in that class but moving into BF3 it is pointless in PUB games where you try to take a tank down yourself, too frustrating to say the least and there is no satisfaction or incentive in trying to take down the tank.
If they fix that class then i personally might have a bit more fun on the open maps, as for the small maps i do quite well with infantry but with vehicles forget about it and thats what BF is supposed to be about but it just feels like a generic FPS that wants to be closer to COD that what BF is supposed to be.

