General BF3 Discussion

Forum for BF3 discussion

Moderators: BF2 Admins, BF3 Admins

Re: General BF3 Discussion

Unread postby Ralph Wiggum » 22 Feb 12, 12:27 am

Even if you're wearing body armour, getting shot is still going to hurt pretty bad and I imagine you won't be running and fighting as efficiently. I mean if you get shot in the body in BF3, you still run around and play like normal, with only a black and white filter to indicate you're wounded.

I don't play HC, but I imagine HS = insta kill, whilst 2 bullets in the body will result in a death sounds pretty reasonable.
Ralph Wiggum

User avatar
Forgotten What The Sky Looks Like
 
Offline
Posts: 2263
Joined: 21 Mar 05, 11:59 pm
Location: Standing on top of the 20th Century Fox logo

Re: General BF3 Discussion

Unread postby -Slayer- » 22 Feb 12, 2:14 am

Ralph Wiggum wrote:Even if you're wearing body armour, getting shot is still going to hurt pretty bad and I imagine you won't be running and fighting as efficiently.

Fractured bruised and even broken ribs and not to mention getting the stuffing knocked out of you, it beats having a hole through you though, I'll take option 1 over 2 any day. :lol:
-Slayer-

User avatar
Senior BF3 Admin
 
Offline
Posts: 3977
Joined: 30 Mar 07, 7:18 pm
Location: Always Watching

Re: General BF3 Discussion

Unread postby Bronze_D » 22 Feb 12, 4:31 am

Highly dependent as well on how well the body armor distributes the impact force.

Some body armor are much more efficient at this than others... ceramic plate inserts help as well of course.

There have been cases of soldiers being hit by 7.62mm warsaw pact round in torso on their armor and not realizing it until examination of their body armor revealed the bullets and the impact on the armor. (their adrenaline may also helped the case)
Image
Bronze_D

User avatar
Never goes to sleep
 
Offline
Posts: 4351
Joined: 5 Sep 03, 4:32 pm
Location: Yuri paradise

Re: General BF3 Discussion

Unread postby bishopoz » 22 Feb 12, 12:33 pm

prob would'nt have been a direct hit from a 7.62 , more a richochet....

pretty sure no body armour will stop a direct hit from a 7.62 round , correct me if i'm mistaken...

i just remember watching a doco on body armour not long ago , and i thought i heard em say they still havnt figured how to stop a round that big..
Image
bishopoz

User avatar
Padawan
 
Offline
Posts: 460
Joined: 5 Oct 05, 9:45 am
Location: Lake Macquarie, NSW

Re: General BF3 Discussion

Unread postby Bronze_D » 22 Feb 12, 12:53 pm

all level IV body armor can withstand direct hit from 7.62mm warsaw armor piercing round or western .30 cal armor piercing round at least once in a specific location.

most usually achieve this using ceramic plate insert designed to absorb the kinetic energy from the round.

some can withstand repeated hits allowing the body armor to be effective even after multiple rounds impacted the armor, while others may break after a single direct hit depending on design but in either case as long as the ceramic insert is there, no single assault rifle round can defeat it.

Modern body armor are fully capable of withstanding at least a single direct hit basically from any assault rifle munition in the world, hence why level III and IV protection body armor are subject to monitoring, they are essentially military grade body armor intended to defeat military rounds.

It's rare to be able to see this tests in video especially the military grade ones, but one of the commercially available body armor is dragonskin and they made a fairly public showcase a few years back where the armor is subjected to several hundred rounds of various munitions, ranging from sidearms (9mm, etc) all the way to assault rifles (7.62mm warsaw), and in one of the demonstration they made for discovery iirc, they GRENADED the armor and it withstood it... though realistically the subject would die from the blast even if it didn't penetrate.



dragonskin was subject to various debate and controversy with the military a while back.
Image
Bronze_D

User avatar
Never goes to sleep
 
Offline
Posts: 4351
Joined: 5 Sep 03, 4:32 pm
Location: Yuri paradise

Re: General BF3 Discussion

Unread postby -Slayer- » 22 Feb 12, 1:37 pm

bishopoz wrote:prob would'nt have been a direct hit from a 7.62 , more a richochet....

pretty sure no body armour will stop a direct hit from a 7.62 round , correct me if i'm mistaken...

You must have missed this post 7.62 armour piercing round.
viewtopic.php?p=2567313#p2567313
-Slayer-

User avatar
Senior BF3 Admin
 
Offline
Posts: 3977
Joined: 30 Mar 07, 7:18 pm
Location: Always Watching

Re: General BF3 Discussion

Unread postby Bronze_D » 22 Feb 12, 2:49 pm

actually that specific test didn't mention what round they used for the test..

and looking from the rounds on the table, it looked like Czech silver tip rounds... which iirc are mild steel core, not exactly armor piercing.
Image
Bronze_D

User avatar
Never goes to sleep
 
Offline
Posts: 4351
Joined: 5 Sep 03, 4:32 pm
Location: Yuri paradise

Re: General BF3 Discussion

Unread postby -Slayer- » 22 Feb 12, 3:10 pm

Bronze_D wrote:actually that specific test didn't mention what round they used for the test..

and looking from the rounds on the table, it looked like Czech silver tip rounds... which iirc are mild steel core, not exactly armor piercing.

Read the edited version of the video at the start.

Grabbed a capture to save you the hassle.

Image
-Slayer-

User avatar
Senior BF3 Admin
 
Offline
Posts: 3977
Joined: 30 Mar 07, 7:18 pm
Location: Always Watching

Re: General BF3 Discussion

Unread postby flex77 » 22 Feb 12, 3:16 pm

lol here we go with the real life video's , testing and applications trying to compare it to a "game" like bf3
flex77

Regular
 
Offline
Posts: 62
Joined: 31 Oct 11, 1:37 pm

Re: General BF3 Discussion

Unread postby Bronze_D » 22 Feb 12, 3:31 pm

-Slayer- wrote:Read the edited version of the video at the start.

Grabbed a capture to save you the hassle.

[ http://i.imgur.com/p2AO7.png ]
they said it's an armor piercing round but they didn't mention what round it was...

the reason i take 'armor piercing' label on publications with a grain of salt is that often anything with steel core is labelled as armor piercing in public media which is not actually true because while they usually have capacity to penetrate some degree of armor, a round intended for the task ie: armor piercing military classified rounds usually have sharp, hardened core specifically designed for it... and not just regular steel core which many military rounds use anyway.

from what's on the table aside of Czech silver tip round, i do see one black tipped round... or at least i think it looked like a black tipped round but they didn't mention what they actually used to fire at it.
Image
Bronze_D

User avatar
Never goes to sleep
 
Offline
Posts: 4351
Joined: 5 Sep 03, 4:32 pm
Location: Yuri paradise

Re: General BF3 Discussion

Unread postby -Slayer- » 22 Feb 12, 4:03 pm

Bronze_D wrote:
-Slayer- wrote:Read the edited version of the video at the start.

Grabbed a capture to save you the hassle.

[ http://i.imgur.com/p2AO7.png ]
they said it's an armor piercing round but they didn't mention what round it was...

The screen shot mentions what was used.
-Slayer-

User avatar
Senior BF3 Admin
 
Offline
Posts: 3977
Joined: 30 Mar 07, 7:18 pm
Location: Always Watching

Re: General BF3 Discussion

Unread postby Bronze_D » 22 Feb 12, 4:35 pm

they showed what rounds they had:

which from what i can see only 2 may be an actual armor piercing round... though i am not sure of it's marking, the second one looks like a black tipped round but the underlying color is difficult to see, while the first looks like armor piercing incendiary tracer round... assuming the video color is accurate.

the rest are not actual armor piercing rounds...

now here's the question, which one they used here?

it's probably not the API round because the impact didn't seems to show any sign of incendiary reaction, so that leaves only 1 'possible' armor piercing round in use from the ones shown on the table... (unless if that's an armor piercing incendiary rounds too, it's hard for me to make out the tip color from the video) except we don't know which round exactly they loaded into the rifle and fired to the vest.
Image
Bronze_D

User avatar
Never goes to sleep
 
Offline
Posts: 4351
Joined: 5 Sep 03, 4:32 pm
Location: Yuri paradise

Re: General BF3 Discussion

Unread postby Dean » 22 Feb 12, 7:38 pm

flex77 wrote:lol here we go with the real life video's , testing and applications trying to compare it to a "game" like bf3



fair point, for what may kill me, may not kill you.


mildly off topic.

During a training session i saw a video from someone who designed a ballistic vest, his sales pitch was to put the vest on and shoot himself in the chest with a .357 :shock:
Image
Dean

BF Admin
 
Offline
Posts: 1499
Joined: 12 Nov 07, 3:03 pm
Location: Melbourne

Re: General BF3 Discussion

Unread postby rcame26 » 22 Feb 12, 9:52 pm

heh i gave up on jets, scout choppers are freaking epic, never really got the pilot seat in attack helicoptors but still loved carving up the competition into bloody chunks with the gunner seat weaponry :D
Darkness Is Eternal - ShadowStrike
Image
rcame26

User avatar
Player
 
Offline
Posts: 35
Joined: 16 Mar 11, 8:35 pm
Location: Eslant, Moradon

Re: General BF3 Discussion

Unread postby The_Pharoah » 24 Feb 12, 8:37 am

"In the absence of orders, go find something and kill it."
- Field Marshal Erwin Rommel
The_Pharoah

Jedi Upstart
 
Offline
Posts: 589
Joined: 31 Aug 03, 10:50 pm
Location: Brisbane, Qld

PreviousNext

Return to Battlefield 3

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

x

#{title}

#{text}