Auto VS Manual

Why this forum is automatic, it's systematic, it's hydromatic, why it's GON lightning!

Automatic or Manual?

Automatic
33
30%
Manual
77
70%
 
Total votes : 110

Re: Auto VS Manual

Unread postby Scarface.au » 25 Oct 11, 7:56 pm

camstatic wrote:I prefer manual but I own an auto at the moment, it is a lot more satisfying to drive since doing some 'upgrades' to it though. (Corvette servo, UHD bands, steel valve body pistons, pressure increase valve, corvette sun gear, heavy duty sprag clutch, Stage II Transgo shift kit.)

Oh noice, so steps sideways on shifts then?
Disclaimer: Views above are strictly my own opinion. If you don't like it.. Well you can fill in the rest.
Scarface.au

Jedi Upstart
 
Offline
Posts: 576
Joined: 11 Oct 07, 11:03 am
Location: home

Re: Auto VS Manual

Unread postby camstatic » 29 Oct 11, 3:34 am

Scarface.au wrote:Oh noice, so steps sideways on shifts then?


It does snatch the rear end if you step on it, on the other hand it's quite gentle if you're light on the pedal though; which I'm sure everything behind the transmission would thank me for if it could. :lol:

It's a 4L60 by the way, aka: mechanical Turbo 700.
Intel i7 2600K @ 4ghz | Gigabyte Z68X-UD3R-B3 | 8gb Kingston Hyper-X DDR3 | EVGA GTX 680 | Corsair Carbide 500R
camstatic

User avatar
Padawan
 
Offline
Posts: 215
Joined: 31 Jan 05, 5:42 pm
Location: Near Adelaide

Auto VS Manual

Unread postby inz » 29 Oct 11, 8:13 pm

So I was kinda close, mechanical, as in full ratchet shift?
Image
inz

User avatar
Sheik of Spam
 
Offline
Posts: 1200
Joined: 23 Sep 03, 9:06 pm
Location: Behind my computer, where it's safe and nobody can hurt me.

Re: Auto VS Manual

Unread postby Scarface.au » 29 Oct 11, 8:24 pm

camstatic wrote:
Scarface.au wrote:Oh noice, so steps sideways on shifts then?


It does snatch the rear end if you step on it, on the other hand it's quite gentle if you're light on the pedal though; which I'm sure everything behind the transmission would thank me for if it could. :lol:

It's a 4L60 by the way, aka: mechanical Turbo 700.

Ah k - so a built commodore box then.. They can be tough! (and if you crack your housing - cheap to shift parts to new box because they're so common). I will be getting an mv-automatics stage 1.5 or 2 shift kit for my A341E soon :D - will be instant shifts practically

TBH im not for or against either auto or manual - its just whatever I happen to have to drive at the time. Auto are quicker in a straight line, and provided you have everything setup right (cooling mainly), can be quicker around a track. Manual are more fun though imo
Disclaimer: Views above are strictly my own opinion. If you don't like it.. Well you can fill in the rest.
Scarface.au

Jedi Upstart
 
Offline
Posts: 576
Joined: 11 Oct 07, 11:03 am
Location: home

Auto VS Manual

Unread postby inz » 30 Oct 11, 8:38 am

Auto will never be faster around a track unless it's DSG.
Image
inz

User avatar
Sheik of Spam
 
Offline
Posts: 1200
Joined: 23 Sep 03, 9:06 pm
Location: Behind my computer, where it's safe and nobody can hurt me.

Re: Auto VS Manual

Unread postby Scarface.au » 30 Oct 11, 10:39 am

inz wrote:Auto will never be faster around a track unless it's DSG.

DSG is a manual box.

Auto can be faster around the track, especially if its built like camstatic's. If you have a fully "manualised" auto - it will be faster.
Disclaimer: Views above are strictly my own opinion. If you don't like it.. Well you can fill in the rest.
Scarface.au

Jedi Upstart
 
Offline
Posts: 576
Joined: 11 Oct 07, 11:03 am
Location: home

Auto VS Manual

Unread postby inz » 30 Oct 11, 7:00 pm

Yes but they operate automatically in "auto" mode, and technically the driver isn't operating the clutch, it's done automatically by a computer. I see your point though.

I disagree. Unless you can prove me wrong, manual shifts in a trans like that are just to agressive for corners. Plus a majority of them don't even have enough gears.

Not to mention "fully built" trans' are usually in cars that don't handle ;)

There is no way in hell you'll ever see a circuit, drift, enduro, le mans, superbike, v8 supercars, motoGP etc. car/bike with a fully mechanical automatic trans. Because they aren't faster. Except in a straight line.

Not to mention they don't offer enough control, and are quite bulky to operate.
Image
inz

User avatar
Sheik of Spam
 
Offline
Posts: 1200
Joined: 23 Sep 03, 9:06 pm
Location: Behind my computer, where it's safe and nobody can hurt me.

Re: Auto VS Manual

Unread postby Scarface.au » 30 Oct 11, 9:08 pm

inz wrote:
Hidden: show
Yes but they operate automatically in "auto" mode, and technically the driver isn't operating the clutch, it's done automatically by a computer. I see your point though.

I disagree. Unless you can prove me wrong, manual shifts in a trans like that are just to agressive for corners. Plus a majority of them don't even have enough gears.

Not to mention "fully built" trans' are usually in cars that don't handle ;)

There is no way in hell you'll ever see a circuit, drift, enduro, le mans, superbike, v8 supercars, motoGP etc. car/bike with a fully mechanical automatic trans. Because they aren't faster. Except in a straight line.

Not to mention they don't offer enough control, and are quite bulky to operate.

I don't see your point. I reckon they're less "bulky" to operate compared to a manual - its either up a gear or down a gear.

I know of quite a few local guys who drift/grip with 'kitted auto's and some of the cars are built for that purpose. The shifts are rough on full-noise, but if you lift-off a little, they're quicker and a lot smoother. Auto's also have a more progressive throttle response due to the way in which they operate & if used right can be a lot faster than you'd think. They don't have the same feeling of control compared with a manual, yes, but thats why they're not really used in racing. I'm not arguing with you about the fact that that most if not all circuit vehicles are manual - its the more fun option to drive afterall.

Superbikes are a different kettle of fish... lol (wet-clutch...)

Your point about DSG's is interesting though - they are a manual box - but with the computer doing the changes = quicker than a normal manual and less powertrain loss compared to an auto (and very similar shift-times). Thats why you see them on all the latest hypercars etc.
Disclaimer: Views above are strictly my own opinion. If you don't like it.. Well you can fill in the rest.
Scarface.au

Jedi Upstart
 
Offline
Posts: 576
Joined: 11 Oct 07, 11:03 am
Location: home

Auto VS Manual

Unread postby inz » 31 Oct 11, 7:38 am

I was more pointing out that they aren't auto, not that they're wet slipper clutches.

A mechanical auto isn't as quick as a manual, sure they can be driven fast, but that comes down to the driver, not the trans.

Your friends drift in autos? Lol, apart from the obvious holden/ford jokes, how do they revmatch, or clutch kick... Lol.
Image
inz

User avatar
Sheik of Spam
 
Offline
Posts: 1200
Joined: 23 Sep 03, 9:06 pm
Location: Behind my computer, where it's safe and nobody can hurt me.

Re: Auto VS Manual

Unread postby Scarface.au » 31 Oct 11, 7:39 pm

inz wrote:A mechanical auto isn't as quick as a manual, sure they can be driven fast, but that comes down to the driver, not the trans.

Says it all :)

inz wrote:Your friends drift in autos? Lol, apart from the obvious holden/ford jokes, how do they revmatch, or clutch kick... Lol.

Who needs to clutch kick when you've got a 1j/2j ? :P and I'm no holden/ford fan (though my daily is a holden)
Disclaimer: Views above are strictly my own opinion. If you don't like it.. Well you can fill in the rest.
Scarface.au

Jedi Upstart
 
Offline
Posts: 576
Joined: 11 Oct 07, 11:03 am
Location: home

Re: Auto VS Manual

Unread postby _Zyklon_ » 1 Nov 11, 1:51 pm

I drove a manual for the first 6 years of my driving life.

Now i have an auto. The only reason i do is because it was just too good to refuse!

I do wish i had a manual though. Its a 4x4, and when off roading i prefer the extra control that the manual gives. Auto does the job as well, i just prefer a manual.

Also, the better fuel economy from manuals is a plus :)
_Zyklon_

User avatar
Padawan
 
Offline
Posts: 149
Joined: 9 Mar 11, 1:15 pm

Re: Auto VS Manual

Unread postby Hell Boy » 1 Nov 11, 1:58 pm

In nearly all situations, manual > auto.

However, if i were to buy a Porsche or a GTR, i think i would go semi auto, purely because it's quicker and the technology is there.
Image
Hell Boy

User avatar
Padawan
 
Offline
Posts: 349
Joined: 16 Jul 06, 5:22 pm
Location: Perth

Auto VS Manual

Unread postby inz » 1 Nov 11, 4:45 pm

Which is DSG and therefore manual.

Success!
Image
inz

User avatar
Sheik of Spam
 
Offline
Posts: 1200
Joined: 23 Sep 03, 9:06 pm
Location: Behind my computer, where it's safe and nobody can hurt me.

Re: Auto VS Manual

Unread postby Jeatalong » 6 Nov 11, 11:05 am

The next car I will be getting wil most likely be an auto, it is getting to the stage that auto gearboxes delivery more economy than manuals. Plus most driving you actually do you don't need the extra control that a manual can give you.
Die with style. Fly with Neh'bu Kau Be'Hude
Image
Jeatalong

User avatar
EvE Moderator
 
Offline
Posts: 5022
Joined: 20 Dec 03, 5:51 pm
Location: Parkes

Re: Auto VS Manual

Unread postby That_Stevens_Guy » 9 Nov 11, 1:27 am

Had a Manual, soon realised that I prefer Automatic with Tiptronic options for my road car. If I was making a track car though, I would probably go a Manual if I can't afford to put in a modern sequential box :P
That_Stevens_Guy

User avatar
1337 p0st3r
 
Offline
Posts: 1038
Joined: 16 Jan 09, 7:22 pm
Location: Brisbane

PreviousNext

Return to Automotive

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

x

#{title}

#{text}