Samsung forced to pay out ~$1bn in damages to Apple

Re: Samsung forced to pay out ~$1bn in damages to Apple

Unread postby lorry_driver » 28 Aug 12, 6:28 pm

Tera wrote:Not sure if this has been posted yet, but it looks like Google finally getting in on this.

http://www.androidpit.com/google-vs-apple-android


ImageImage
lorry_driver

Padawan
 
Offline
Posts: 132
Joined: 1 Mar 05, 11:02 am
Location: In my pimp'ed out Mack truck

Re: Samsung forced to pay out ~$1bn in damages to Apple

Unread postby Auld » 28 Aug 12, 6:38 pm

The problem with Google suing over this particular set of patents is that it will have industry wide ramifications, not just for Apple.

America needs to overhaul its patent laws, these lawsuits are ridiculous.
Auld

User avatar
Story Teller
 
Offline
Posts: 1863
Joined: 28 Aug 06, 10:47 am
Location: Orc-land

Re: Samsung forced to pay out ~$1bn in damages to Apple

Unread postby PalZer0 » 28 Aug 12, 6:43 pm

Hopefully there's enough popcorn for this one.
DRM is like kids. The less you have, the better.

#ati on GameSurge - unofficial ATi support channel
Twitter | Facebook | Steam | Xfire | Raptr
PalZer0

User avatar
Offline? What's 'offline'?
 
Offline
Posts: 3298
Joined: 29 Mar 07, 5:22 pm

Re: Samsung forced to pay out ~$1bn in damages to Apple

Unread postby skitzor » 28 Aug 12, 9:14 pm

Tera wrote:Not sure if this has been posted yet, but it looks like Google finally getting in on this.

http://www.androidpit.com/google-vs-apple-android

that article is getting a bit of flak around the internet for being sensationalist, badly written and containing little information.

I think the important point that needs to be understood is the difference between an essential and non-essential patent. here's a decent explanation of the difference I grabbed from reddit user nana_nanananananana.

If Google sues using essential patents then even if they win, the court can force them to license the patent to Apple for a fair value. Google gets money, but that's it. This keeps patents from destroying entire industries, at least in theory (in reality, they still destroy smaller industries with regularity).

If Google sues using non-essential patents then the court cannot force Google to license the patents. Instead, Apple may have to pull infringing products from its stores, which is far more damaging.


and here's a forbes article on the topic that might be a little more informative. http://www.forbes.com/sites/timworstall ... ues-apple/

edit: something else that I found to be an interesting analogy.
http://www.slate.com/blogs/moneybox/2012/08/25/apple_v_samsung_verdict_creates_new_pinch_to_zoon_monopoly_that_s_bad_for_consumers.html wrote:Think about cars and you'll see that, of course, lots of different companies make cars. But they all have some very similar user interface elements. In particular, there's a steering wheel that you turn left and right to shift the wheels and there's a gas pedal and breaks that you hit with your right foot. Imagine if the way the automobile industry worked was that each car maker had to devise a unique user interface. So maybe GM cars would have a steering wheel, but Toyotas would have a joystick, and Honda you would steer with your feel and use your hands to control the gas and breaks.

In some sense there'd be "more innovation" in this world since there'd be this kind of arbitrary proliferation of user interfaces. But in a more important sense there'd be less competition, since there are only so many viable ways for a person to interact with a car and a lot of those ways suck.

my only problem is that I don't believe Apple is stopping people from using pinch-and-zoom, just asking for money every time someone uses it. but the issues here are similar.
Image
skitzor

User avatar
Forgotten What The Sky Looks Like
 
Offline
Posts: 2778
Joined: 1 May 03, 3:10 pm
Location: snapping necks and cashing cheques

Re: Samsung forced to pay out ~$1bn in damages to Apple

Unread postby Ashigaru » 28 Aug 12, 11:56 pm

Thanks for linking the Forbes article skitzor, they're both great reads, but the Forbes article puts it in a real world perspective. I for one hope Google wipe the floor with them. Put the smarmy buggers back in their place...
Ashigaru

User avatar
1337 p0st3r
 
Offline
Posts: 1080
Joined: 30 May 05, 1:11 am
Location: Melbourne, Vic

Re: Samsung forced to pay out ~$1bn in damages to Apple

Unread postby Wolfstar90 » 30 Aug 12, 11:53 am

Ashigaru wrote:I for one hope Google wipe the floor with them. Put the smarmy buggers back in their place...


Then we can go back to having phones with awful, counter-intuitive interfaces! Yay!
Wolfstar90

User avatar
Jedi Upstart
 
Offline
Posts: 659
Joined: 28 Aug 07, 9:34 pm

Re: Samsung forced to pay out ~$1bn in damages to Apple

Unread postby diamondd » 30 Aug 12, 12:00 pm

Look out! We've got an iPhone fan!

Image

seriously though, counter-intuitive is a massive stretch. At the very least I'd take my back and home buttons over a conglomerate button any day of the week.
diamondd

User avatar
Forgotten What The Sky Looks Like
 
Offline
Posts: 2565
Joined: 23 Sep 08, 7:12 pm

Re: Samsung forced to pay out ~$1bn in damages to Apple

Unread postby Wolfstar90 » 30 Aug 12, 12:21 pm

I'll take my pinch and tap to zoom and multitouch gestures then. Also my black rectangle with rounded edges and a screen.

Also I'm quite disappointed that this isn't true:
http://en.paperblog.com/samsung-pays-ap ... ns-294795/

Still funny.
Wolfstar90

User avatar
Jedi Upstart
 
Offline
Posts: 659
Joined: 28 Aug 07, 9:34 pm

Re: Samsung forced to pay out ~$1bn in damages to Apple

Unread postby diamondd » 30 Aug 12, 12:28 pm

Wolfstar90 wrote:I'll take my pinch and tap to zoom and multitouch gestures then. Also my black rectangle with rounded edges and a screen.

haha, don't care I'm keeping them anyway! I don't think ROM modders are going to comply to Apple's lawsuit :P

Wolfstar90 wrote:Also I'm quite disappointed that this isn't true:
http://en.paperblog.com/samsung-pays-ap ... ns-294795/

Still funny.

yeah, that would be so epic :lol:
diamondd

User avatar
Forgotten What The Sky Looks Like
 
Offline
Posts: 2565
Joined: 23 Sep 08, 7:12 pm

Re: Samsung forced to pay out ~$1bn in damages to Apple

Unread postby Matty » 30 Aug 12, 2:18 pm

Wolfstar90 wrote:Then we can go back to having phones with awful, counter-intuitive interfaces! Yay!


Because Apple addressed that issue in full right? :roll:
This iPhone I have is my first and last Apple product I'm ever going own.
Matty

User avatar
Never goes to sleep
 
Offline
Posts: 4133
Joined: 26 Aug 10, 12:23 pm
Location: Adelaide

Re: Samsung forced to pay out ~$1bn in damages to Apple

Unread postby Ashigaru » 30 Aug 12, 2:32 pm

Wolfstar90 wrote:
Ashigaru wrote:I for one hope Google wipe the floor with them. Put the smarmy buggers back in their place...


Then we can go back to having phones with awful, counter-intuitive interfaces! Yay!



Sadly my first response disappeared! Anyway, Apple isn't getting sued for the interface they use, they're getting sued by google for the use of a non-essential patent. Your interface and bad argument are both safe :)
Ashigaru

User avatar
1337 p0st3r
 
Offline
Posts: 1080
Joined: 30 May 05, 1:11 am
Location: Melbourne, Vic

Re: Samsung forced to pay out ~$1bn in damages to Apple

Unread postby Sathias » 30 Aug 12, 2:46 pm

Wolfstar90 wrote:
Ashigaru wrote:I for one hope Google wipe the floor with them. Put the smarmy buggers back in their place...


Then we can go back to having phones with awful, counter-intuitive interfaces! Yay!


At least we would have awful counter-intuitive interfaces that don't require iTunes.
Image

"Only the madman is absolutely sure." - Robert Anton Wilson
Sathias

User avatar
Not allowed to leave
 
Offline
Posts: 9205
Joined: 30 Jul 03, 10:49 pm
Location: South Australia, home of Coopers

Re: Samsung forced to pay out ~$1bn in damages to Apple

Unread postby diamondd » 30 Aug 12, 2:52 pm

Sathias wrote:At least we would have awful counter-intuitive interfaces that don't require iTunes.

zing!

actually I always forget iPhones need iTunes, what an abomination. That software was the bane of my existence for years.
diamondd

User avatar
Forgotten What The Sky Looks Like
 
Offline
Posts: 2565
Joined: 23 Sep 08, 7:12 pm

Re: Samsung forced to pay out ~$1bn in damages to Apple

Unread postby Matty » 30 Aug 12, 3:50 pm

And counter intuitive phones that let you use an audio file as a ring tone. Or message tone. Or an alarm tone.
Or deleting pictures via PC.
Or letting you use it as mass storage.

Also I remember my girlfriends galaxy having that pull down menu thing (where you swipe down from the top of the screen and you can see messages etc.) and that little sms message preview at the top of the screen when you receive a text way before my iPhone did.
Matty

User avatar
Never goes to sleep
 
Offline
Posts: 4133
Joined: 26 Aug 10, 12:23 pm
Location: Adelaide

Re: Samsung forced to pay out ~$1bn in damages to Apple

Unread postby Chucky » 30 Aug 12, 4:39 pm

Matty wrote:Also I remember my girlfriends galaxy having that pull down menu thing (where you swipe down from the top of the screen and you can see messages etc.) and that little sms message preview at the top of the screen when you receive a text way before my iPhone did.


Yep iPhone copied the notification screen straight from Android (Samsung/HTC etc) without a doubt. Yet to this day they refuse to copy Bluetooth/Wifi shortcuts, it was one of the reasons I finally ditched my iPhone for an Android based phone.
Image
Chucky

User avatar
Moderator
 
Offline
Posts: 15601
Joined: 25 Nov 04, 6:42 pm

PreviousNext

Return to GON Lounge

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: DarkMellie, SpEEd_NiNjA and 9 guests