Tera wrote:Not sure if this has been posted yet, but it looks like Google finally getting in on this.
http://www.androidpit.com/google-vs-apple-android
Tera wrote:Not sure if this has been posted yet, but it looks like Google finally getting in on this.
http://www.androidpit.com/google-vs-apple-android


Tera wrote:Not sure if this has been posted yet, but it looks like Google finally getting in on this.
http://www.androidpit.com/google-vs-apple-android
If Google sues using essential patents then even if they win, the court can force them to license the patent to Apple for a fair value. Google gets money, but that's it. This keeps patents from destroying entire industries, at least in theory (in reality, they still destroy smaller industries with regularity).
If Google sues using non-essential patents then the court cannot force Google to license the patents. Instead, Apple may have to pull infringing products from its stores, which is far more damaging.
http://www.slate.com/blogs/moneybox/2012/08/25/apple_v_samsung_verdict_creates_new_pinch_to_zoon_monopoly_that_s_bad_for_consumers.html wrote:Think about cars and you'll see that, of course, lots of different companies make cars. But they all have some very similar user interface elements. In particular, there's a steering wheel that you turn left and right to shift the wheels and there's a gas pedal and breaks that you hit with your right foot. Imagine if the way the automobile industry worked was that each car maker had to devise a unique user interface. So maybe GM cars would have a steering wheel, but Toyotas would have a joystick, and Honda you would steer with your feel and use your hands to control the gas and breaks.
In some sense there'd be "more innovation" in this world since there'd be this kind of arbitrary proliferation of user interfaces. But in a more important sense there'd be less competition, since there are only so many viable ways for a person to interact with a car and a lot of those ways suck.

Ashigaru wrote:I for one hope Google wipe the floor with them. Put the smarmy buggers back in their place...

Wolfstar90 wrote:I'll take my pinch and tap to zoom and multitouch gestures then. Also my black rectangle with rounded edges and a screen.
Wolfstar90 wrote:Also I'm quite disappointed that this isn't true:
http://en.paperblog.com/samsung-pays-ap ... ns-294795/
Still funny.
Wolfstar90 wrote:Then we can go back to having phones with awful, counter-intuitive interfaces! Yay!
Wolfstar90 wrote:Ashigaru wrote:I for one hope Google wipe the floor with them. Put the smarmy buggers back in their place...
Then we can go back to having phones with awful, counter-intuitive interfaces! Yay!
Wolfstar90 wrote:Ashigaru wrote:I for one hope Google wipe the floor with them. Put the smarmy buggers back in their place...
Then we can go back to having phones with awful, counter-intuitive interfaces! Yay!

Sathias wrote:At least we would have awful counter-intuitive interfaces that don't require iTunes.
Matty wrote:Also I remember my girlfriends galaxy having that pull down menu thing (where you swipe down from the top of the screen and you can see messages etc.) and that little sms message preview at the top of the screen when you receive a text way before my iPhone did.

Users browsing this forum: DarkMellie, SpEEd_NiNjA and 9 guests