Moderator: Content Admins
BorisBC wrote:Pro tip - if you have to spew in a car, spew down the (inside) front of your shirt. Trust me, it's a lot easier to clean spew off yourself than the interior of a car.
PalZer0 wrote:Also, I've seen reports of people's accounts being hacked even with authenticators. How are Blizzard dealing with that?
Marius wrote:It's not blizzard's fault that people use minimum length passwords.
Making passwords case sensitive won't do anything unless the user goes beyond minimum level security, because it's up to the user to do something like KlmStV867, instead of porsche. The user who uses porsche or something guessable like that won't use the case sensitive mix. They'll still get hacked, even if they had the option to use better password security.
In short... password security is a user responsibility, and people shouldn't blame Blizzard if they have guessable passwords.
Bronze_D wrote:Yeah, that would be the case if they had a proper security layer..
but see the thing is, i can't recall any decent security barrier that uses case insensitive password layer.
if even that is not in place, what are the chances that they actually got a decent layer behind it to stop generator permutations?
Marius wrote:I can remember that...
Klam Street V8 '67.
Clam, on a street, with a '67 model V8.
Tydus wrote:I imagine they have a very good security layer and have made the conscious chose to disable case sensitivity so that people have less trouble entering their passwords and they have less stupid tech support phone calls tickets from people being unable to log in. I find this answer makes a lot more sense then the idea that a multi-billion dollar company hasn't figured out high school level security. As i said, if they have a system in place to deal with brute force hacking, then having case sensitivity is pretty unnecessary.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests