by Mekon » 7 Jun 12, 11:56 am
I'd like to think I'm a fairly well-adjusted individual. I'm happily married, I treat women with respect, with a vaguely chivalrous bent at times. I believe in equality, I don't believe in arbitrary distinctions between men and women - we are all humans. And for that reason... I don't have an issue with the trailer. It's gratuitous, yes. But I don't buy into the feminist backlash.
Dragging rape into it is ridiculous - everyone is entitled to their own opinion, if people don't like the trailer, fine. If they do, that's ok too. I'm in neither camp - couldn't care less.
Isn't it ironic that the feminist cause was for the purpose of allowing women to choose how they wished to live their lives (and participate fully in society), free of male control... yet we still cling to the idea that women dressed in latex or wearing skimpy clothing are sexualised. Doesn't that reflect somewhat poorly on the observer's attitude?
edit: Yes, rape is bad. As pointed out in Brendan Keough's article - you can't blame the victims because of the way they may have dressed, the fault lies entirely with the perpetrator. So why, in a trailer depicting nuns in latex, with no actual sex or rape (unless somehow murder/killing is now defined as rape) is the concept raised?
Clearly people are still confused about just how they should feel about the opposite sex and are projecting said confusion on anything borderline or open to different interpretations.
Last edited by
Mekon on 7 Jun 12, 12:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.