skitzor wrote:$had0w wrote:which, in diamondd's second last post, he provided enough information and evidence to destroy that theory, and you were just like 'nope, not listening'
what you don't seem to understand is that those issues are minor compared to the issue of Bond constantly changing appearance. as I said, just because the codename theory has a few holes, doesn't mean yours is correct.
See, this is where your point is just silly tbh.
That's like saying you only ever want one person to play bond, and if that happened, we'd still not be getting bond movies coz the character would be too old.
That is why the bond keeps changing. Its not some kind of conspiracy to make people think its just a code name, its clearly the exact same character in every one, despite looking different with different actors.
I dont see how this is so hard to understand. I really really dont.
From the opening credits up until Javier Bardem appears I was uninterested - the mystery/intrigue didn't capture my attention, the action bits felt overly artistic/sterile and didn't seem to flow with the movie, it felt like the script had 'insert action piece here" written in it, and I'm afraid Daniel Craig just isn't interesting enough to carry the movie by himself.