Riot Games backs down on LCS streaming restrictions following community outrage

leagueoflegends

By on December 9, 2013 at 11:25 am

Last Thursday we learned that Riot Games’ contracts for the fourth season of League of Legends League Championship Series forbid competitors from streaming any of a wide number of games – including not just direct competitors like Dota 2 and Heroes of Newerth, but also the likes of Diablo, Hearthstone and World of Tanks. After several days of outrage from the community however, on the weekend Riot Games changed its policy, allowing competitors to stream any game. The change was announced on Reddit, where Riot explained:

After reading all of your comments and having a LOT of internal debate over the last 24 hours, we’re going to be changing the LCS team requirement to something that more closely matches our intent. While under contract to the LCS, teams and players can’t accept sponsorship from other game companies to promote other titles. Besides that, they are free to stream any games they want.

Which I think we can all agree is much better than the previous policy. For any other companies out there looking to set up a sports league for their game, I have some advice – if at any point you find yourself using the NFL model to defend your policies, you are probably doing it wrong.

5 comments (Leave your own)

I honestly didn’t see the problem with it… The NFL is one of the biggest sporting organizations in the world so using their business model doesn’t seem like that bad of an idea… unless its dealing with player concussions, which I don’t think is a problem with LoL

 
Nasty Wet Smear

notthatdoug:
… unless its dealing with player concussions, which I don’t think is a problem with LoL

You’d be surprised…

 

nastywetsmear: You’d be surprised…

Keyboard attacks or frustrated head banging?

 

Hell even back in my LAN attending days, CoD2 tournaments would often lead out into the carpark. ahh good times.

 

notthatdoug,

The NFL is huge because they are a giant monopoly of pricks. It’s a really good business model to follow if you completely dominate a particular area of sports and have several decades and billions of dollars with which to buy anti-competitive legislation and that hilarious blackout crap. But if you are just starting up it’s just a good way to get your fans and your players to hate you.

 
Leave a comment

You can use the following bbCode
[i], [b], [img], [quote], [url href="http://www.google.com/"]Google[/url]

Leave a Reply

PC Gaming Calendar 2014

Follow Games.on.net

YouTube

Steam Group

Upcoming Games

Community Soapbox

Recent Features
Doom

DOOM: We go hands-on with id’s breakneck-speed bloodbath

Fast, furious, and with a little bit of demonic possession mixed-in. What's not to like?

avcon_indies_2015

AVCon Indies 2015: The Five Games We’d Most Like To Give Ultimately Meaningless Awards To

We return to Adelaide's AVCon to sample some of Australia's finest indies.

Heroes of the Storm

Heroes of the Storm: Breaking down the MOBA barriers makes for better gameplay

By equalising all players, Heroes of the Storm leads to better competition, not weaker, says James.

battlecry

BattleCry hands-on: Bethesda’s F2P title still needs more time

James is forbidden from shouting his battle cries in public, but he is not forbidden from playing BattleCry.

Streaming Radio
Radio Streams are restricted to iiNet group customers.

GreenManGaming MREC

Facebook Like Box