You Know What I Love? Not Saving The World


By on May 28, 2013 at 10:08 am

You know what I love? Games where I don’t have to save the world. Or the universe. Or the country. I love games where the stakes are something more personal and mundane. Games that have a story that just has me deal with one person’s problems as they go about their life. Rather than being uneventful or boring, it is these stories that I feel most emotionally attached to.

The vast majority of mainstream games are about saving a large, indefinite number of people from some fundamental, massive evil. Either I have to save the planet from some evil intergalactic force, or I have to save America from evil communists, or I have to save the entire universe from some god-like evil being. Sometimes this is a direct story event—a timer is counting down until the nuclear missiles are launched. Often, it is more indirect — let the bad guy get away with this stolen technology and it will mean a new world order!

Undeniably, there are plenty of great games in this save-the-world archetype. But it’s just so… easy. Want to make your audience care about a story? Tell them everybody is going to die. It’s the lazy way out.

The problem with it, for me, is it often becomes abstract. Individual characters and their personal stories are overshadowed by large, abstract, depersonalised objects like ‘Earth’ or ‘The Universe’ or ‘America’. The stakes aren’t bigger, they are just more abstract. You can only care about the planet blowing up so much.

Instead, I love those games that focus on the personal stories. The stories that most of the world won’t even notice, but which might mean life-or-death for the individuals at the center of it. Even though the stakes in these games might be more mundane, the face they are more personal helps me to be more emotionally evolved in the story.

It’s something that has always attracted me to Rockstar’s games. I love how Grand Theft Auto IV is just about this one guy in a massive city that couldn’t care less about him or his woes. Nothing Niko Bellic does, no matter how absurd or bombastic, ever puts the entire city at risk, never drastically effects Liberty City. Life in the city just keeps going, with or without him.

Even as Max Payne 3 progresses and secret conspiracies are revealed, the story and who it effects is still contained to a knowable region and group of people. With Max, I go through all the ridiculous, over-the-top action I might with any other videogame character, but instead of saving the entire world, I’m just trying to save a few people and kill a few others.

I was not a big fan of LA Noire’s gameplay. But even still, I became engaged enough with the story to see it through to the end, simply because it was so contained. There were characters I could attach to and empathise with. I was able to tolerate the gameplay that wasn’t really for me because there was something personal for me to become emotionally attached to in the story. I wasn’t just going through the motions to save the world like I do in so many games. I was doing something that was meaningful for a few people.

And that’s why I love not saving the world. Each of these games have a story with knowable, human characters with knowable, human problems. I find it much easier to connect with and empathise with one person than I do with ‘the entire world’. Raising the stakes to a save-the-world level can create amazing set pieces for a game, to be sure, but it can also lose those characters that allow us to connect with a story in the first place. Sometimes it is just so refreshing to just be driving around a town solving a murder. It’s more mundane, but it is also more personal.

7 comments (Leave your own)

This is what annoyed me about the last segments of Persona 4. It starts off as a personal, small scale murder mystery, but then decides to randomly throw in some super powerful gods and make it a typical big-scale JRPG story.


Rockstar definitely has a good record as far a characterisation. It can sometimes make your own in-game actions seem out-of-character though.
A good read.


I don’t mind saving the world, I’d just prefer that I didn’t always have to do it by myself.

Having said that, I liked Alan Wake where I was mostly concerned with saving myself and the wife, rather than trying to be some savior of the town.


Exactly. Hammer meets nail. This issue is something that has plagued game writing for years. Many potentially great games fall short because of it. However the flip side is there are people who could care less about the smaller personal stories and love the grander scale. Though personally I’d put that group as a lot smaller than the people who like detail in their characters ;)


I don’t mind saving the world either, but it’s nice when t’s the result of just trying to save my friends or something, makes it feel a bit more personal to me. Not to say I wouldn’t like more games where the world keeps going around you, and nothing you do will change anything in the larger sense.


I agree.
Make me care about the world and the characters in it, I’ll happily (and sometimes frantically) try to protect them. Most of the time I don’t give a damn.


Some men just want to watch the world burn

Leave a comment

You can use the following bbCode
[i], [b], [img], [quote], [url href=""]Google[/url]

Leave a Reply

PC Gaming Calendar 2014


Steam Group

Upcoming Games

Releasing Soon
Thief Shadowrun Returns South Park: The Stick of Truth

Community Soapbox

Recent Features
The Elder Scrolls Online Grabnadz

The Elder Scrolls Online journals: One giant, kinda laggy leap for orc-kind

Levels one through fifteen of The Elder Scrolls Online are demolished by an angry orc mage-tank.

Watch Dogs

Watch Dogs PC hands-on: Not the perfect open world, but still a world of fun

Watch Dogs offers a generous array of options, and we push the boundaries to see how far we can go.


Heroes of the Storm: Blizzard’s Dustin Browder on rage problems, hybrid roles, and balance

"We’re trying to make it so if there’s something obvious that you want to do, it’s the right thing to do. There’s no sort of hidden rules or hidden strategies that make that wrong."


ArcheAge’s alpha impressions: The freeform Korean MMO that might just live up to its promises

This high-flying Korean MMO has finally made it to a Western release. James jumps in to see if the promise 'sandpark' model delivers.

Reaper of Souls

Diablo 3: Reaper of Souls reviewed: Change is a good thing

Blizzard shows that it isn't afraid to change everything

Streaming Radio
Radio Streams are restricted to iiNet group customers.

GreenManGaming MREC

The Regulars

Sitrep: Hating Guns and Totally Loving Playing With Guns

Toby's absent-minded shower thoughts arrive for your edification.

The Secret World

Legal Opinion: Bait and switch… with a mankini

Not everybody is laughing following Funcom's April Fools joke on its players.

Bad at Aiming

Sitrep: Waiting in line at the FPS dole queue

Toby is so incompetent that he needs an entire new genre of games invented just to cater for him.

Amazon Fire

Friday Tech Roundup (04 April 2014): Radeon R9 295X2 specs leak

Also, the man behind the "Microsoft" phone scam has been captured and fined.

Facebook Like Box