StarCraft II: Heart of the Swarm Multiplayer Review: A powerful evolution

StarCraft II: Heart of the Swarm

By on March 20, 2013 at 1:02 pm

Looking for a review of the single-player campaign? Click here for our video review.

Perhaps the most telling observation one can make about Heart of the Swarm is that, despite it being their expansion, Zerg players are the least happy about the changes.

They’re not despondent; they’re just not cheering from the aisles. It’s particularly noticeable in Australia, whose competitive scene has been characterised with an unhealthy degree of Zerg commanders for the last two years. Most of our tournaments were strictly all-Zerg affairs: Jared “PiG” Krensel, for instance, won the Australian leg of the Blizzard World Championship Series purely thanks to his prowess in the Zerg vs Zerg mirror.

Changing the status quo, obviously, can only be a good thing. But it’s not as if the race is at a distinct disadvantage across the board, as Andrew “mOOnGlaDe” Pender showcased at the HotS launch in Federation Square. It’s just that the collective’s knowledge has effectively been reset.

But one thing is certain: one year from now, the state of Heart of the Swarm will be substantially different from the Heart of the Swarm you see today. This is the essence of StarCraft: change.

Consider Wings of Liberty. A Zerg player hasn’t seen much from his Protoss opponent beyond the usual forge/expansion play, so he wants to play safely. They know that at around 7 minutes and 30 seconds, they need to build a spore crawler. There’s no guarantee that Dark Templars are on the way, but if they build one now, they know they’ll be safe.

This sort of general understanding of how the races and units interact with each other after the last three years — and more importantly, what interactions are possible and at what times — has become so vast that reactions like these are common even among the lower leagues. (There are obviously more exact examples — overlord scout timings, times to scan as a Terran and so on — but this is just for illustrative purposes.)

It’s particularly crucial for Zerg, which is a reactive race by nature. That’s why the professional Zergs I’ve spoken to are so concerned about the next six months. The chasm of the unknown is incredibly unnerving after enjoying two straight years of knowing every possible counter.

Right now, that comprehensive database of timings and responses, despite the lengthy beta test, does not currently exist. Players of all races are now re-feeling their way through the new units and the new maps. Many will be happy to recycle strategies from Wings of Liberty, play it safe for a week or so and see what changes Blizzard decides to implement.

But one thing is certain: one year from now, the state of Heart of the Swarm will be substantially different from the Heart of the Swarm you see today. This is the essence of StarCraft: change.

If you’re not prepared for that, if you can’t accept or are too flustered to cope with the wildly changing circumstances of the various matchups, Heart of the Swarm is not the game for you. In fact, I’d wager that real-time strategy probably isn’t your genre. Stability, in terms of how players approach the game, has never been par for the course.

This is what playing StarCraft is truly about: throwing yourself into the unknown, over and over again.

A finer analysis

On a more practical level, players are going to play safe, which means a lot of very non-greedy, gas-intensive, delayed expansion builds. This obviously isn’t the case for Zerg; but it’s going to take quite some time until you see Terrans happily expanding off a single Barracks in the first few minutes, for instance.

It’s a necessity, really, considering that most of the new units have an immediate effect within the first five minutes. The widow mine’s zoning ability can be rather handy in delaying marine/zergling-based attacks. The Mothership Core is a great defensive unit of its own, making fast expansions much more versatile in the Protoss mirror match.

Probably the change with the most potential is the new recall ability for Protoss, which could transform matches against Zerg from the current WarCraft 3-esque major-battle centric style to something a little more decentralised, similar to the multi-pronged high intensity battles you see whenever good Terrans and Zergs face off.

And yet the old styles of going for a huge deathball, with or without the power of the Tempest/Oracle/Mothership Core, is still completely viable. But it’s also more vulnerable than ever before too. Terran’s range has been substantially upgraded: Siege Tanks are more readily available with the siege mode upgrade no longer a requirement, while Thors no longer get instantly negated by High Templars.

There isn’t a single match-up where a use can’t be found for every unit. Even Ravens have more utility, although it took at least two years before players could find any role for them at all (beyond building one or two for detection).

Stepping into the swarm

You’ll find most of the best changes have been made outside of the game itself, with the interface and menu system receiving a huge overhaul in the last few months.

The ability to resume from replays will be the lifeblood for tournaments plagued by internet connectivity issues. It works relatively smoothly and will in itself become a massive boon for players looking to practice their late-game. Alternatively, you could get a friend and play out certain battles from major tournament matches to practice your mechanics (or perhaps even find a better way to engage).

Global Play will save professional teams a tonne of money, since multiple accounts are no longer required to access different servers. That makes it a little cheaper for professional teams or hardcore players looking to test their mettle in the shark-infested waters of the Korean server.

The opening interface itself is far more functional too. There’s more news, it’s more relevant and more broader in its scope. Patch notes are easily accessible through an in-game link; tournaments now get direct coverage through the opening menu.

Players get far more information through the post-game menu. The build order tab hasn’t changed, although it’s a lot slicker and much cleaner than before. A new tab called Performance gives you an outline of your average performance against the game you just played.

The profile page now has statistics built in for each match-up and race, which is a great boon for newer players looking to analyse their flaws. It’s easy to read and use and is good if you can’t get your head around SC2gears (although the third-party program is still far more comprehensive than Blizzard’s additions).

Still, it’s a step in the right direction for a game as heavily focused on competitive play. There’s even a new Reviews system, akin to something you’d see in DOTA 2 or League of Legends. And the much broader challenge mode, while not as comprehensive as some build-order tutorials you might find on Youtube, provides sufficient instruction for newer players to ease them into ladder matches.

All-rounder of the year

Heart of the Swarm has greatly improved the social facilities as well. Wings of Liberty didn’t even have chat channels or clan support upon launch; those oversights have been rectified. The Arcade section better caters towards the mapmaking community with a better framework for newer maps, instead of the previous system that made it difficult to find anything but the most popular.

It’s a much-needed evolution, given that the strength of the StarCraft and WarCraft 3 communities was their exceptionally deep roster of custom games, the eternally-popular Defence of the Ancients being a shining example.

In just a few seconds, I came across a turn-based card game. Then there’s the Starcraft Universe single-player MMO. There’s even a map that showcases every unit and explosion over the course of a minute, which caches all the assets and improves in-game performance provided you run it once every time you open the game.

SC2’s editor is a powerful, powerful beast, and the capacity for mapmakers to create even more amazing games has just increased exponentially.

Two-thirds of the way there

With Heart of the Swarm’s release, StarCraft 2 is, at least commercially,  two-thirds complete. But what direction does the series go from here?

Further upgrades to the back-end, editor and the interface seem the most likely path. A more comprehensive multiplayer tutorial for each of the three races wouldn’t hurt either; while the challenge mode and the campaigns ease you into the mechanics, something to teach players basic build orders would be a clever addition.

The new units in Heart of the Swarm make sense because they filled roles that the races lacked in Wings of Liberty. Terrans needed a better solution to the Infestor/Brood Lord combo that didn’t break the Zerg/Protoss match-up. Protoss needed a way to safely expand against Zerg that wouldn’t ruin games against Terrans, where fast expansions were already common.

So what holes are currently missing in the overall armory? The only immediate one I can see is perhaps a way for Protoss to become much more mobile than before against Zerg, giving them the tools to completely decentralise the match-up away from the deathball-style that has become so prevalent over the last few years.

The inclusions of the Tempest have made late game a much more interesting proposition for Protoss users, but it doesn’t mean massing a huge army isn’t still a safer and more viable plan than multi-pronged attacks.

Conversely, will huge waves of mine-fields bog down the Terran vs Zerg match-up? The most recent Major League Gaming tournament has shown indications that this kind of zonal play will become more popular in the future, particularly when players get a better handle on the exact positioning of the mines.

It’s a new, strange world. Nobody knows exactly where we’ll end up 12 months from now. But there is one thing I can guarantee: if you buy into Heart of the Swarm, you’ll still have a perfectly functional, complex and fascinating game with a vibrant community in a year.

You can’t say that about very many games in this day and age.

Good:

  • Brand new menu UI injects life into Battle.net 2.0
  • Blizzard’s attentive eye for balance means the game will remain in a highly playable state for years
  • StarCraft 2 editor is probably a great way to break into the gaming industry, and it just got more powerful
  • No more “WE WANT LAN” when you can resume from a replay
  • Global Play lets one account play on every server
  • Clan support!
  • Unranked play makes the game less intimidating for lower leagues and lets more advanced players dabble with the other races without ruining their record
  • Coverage of community news in-game has been expanded substantially

Bad:

  • No in-game browser to watch forums or streams, although this is less a downside than it is a luxury

Product for this review supplied by Blizzard.

12 comments (Leave your own)

Does Global Play mean I could buy the CE from Amazon for $80 and there wouldn’t be any compatibility issues with the key and my account?

Good review btw, making me want to get it now hahaha.

 

vand,

That should work fine I think Vand, I don’t see a reason why it wouldn’t, as from a WoL SEA copy, you could already add a US account, so I don’t see why you can’t just add a HOTS US one straight off.

Nice review Alex, I entirely agree, the interface is much better than it was for WoL, hopefully enough to get more players to stick around and play new custom maps and the like.

 

Great review, my wife and brother in law are playing through SC2 currently and loving it to bits. From this review, i can see why :D

 

Your intro just confirms why I don’t want to play Starcraft multiplayer. Who the hell wants to play a fairly complex game where most players know, down to the second, what unit to build or action to perform to optimise winning? Not fun on any level IMHO, and totally alienating for anyone unable to dedicate hundreds of hours to learning the game.

 

caitsith01,

I don’t know any of these things! That is why I only play unranked games against people who also don’t understand what “APM” means*.

*I know what APM means

 

Tim Colwill:
caitsith01,

I don’t know any of these things! That is why I only play unranked games against people who also don’t understand what “APM” means*.

*I know what APM means

The multiplayer matchmaking works in such a way that you will always be playing people of similar skill level and winning 50% of the time. It’s quite ridiculous. Also, caitsith01, not everyone knows the timing off by heart not by a long shot and due to the new expansion all of those timings are reset so the game is yours for the taking.

 

caitsith01,

You do realize that you get paired against players of a similar skill level, right?
You don’t need to sink hundreds of hours into the game to have fun with the MP.

 

slazza,

You most certainly do not, i just quit ( and threw my authenticator in the trash)
Because i kept getting paired against players and 3 and 4 leagues above me.

 

gamecubejedi:
slazza,

You most certainly do not, i just quit ( and threw my authenticator in the trash)
Because i kept getting paired against players and 3 and 4 leagues above me.

indeed there is no guarantee you will be paired with someone of a similar skill level

 

it really isn’t that hard of a game to pick up. With proper scouting you can counter just about anything thrown your way, especially if you play Zerg they are so gloriously versatile it makes for good matches. As a Terran player through and through my MP experience is a lot of fun. Sure knowing build orders helps, but not all the time. It’s like everthing, the more you play the more you pickup.

 

gamecubejedi:
slazza,

You most certainly do not, i just quit ( and threw my authenticator in the trash)
Because i kept getting paired against players and 3 and 4 leagues above me.

That was my experience with Wings of Victory (or whatever it’s called).

I’m reasonably good at RTS games (or at least I was in the old school days of TA, SupCom etc), and I would find after a random time from 5-15 minutes about 3000 enemy units would swarm across the map and annihilate me.

 

Blizzard is really evolving starcraft 2 as an esports and starcraft 2 is getting bigger and bigger. props to blizzard for improving a already great game in something truly awesome. :)

 
Leave a comment

You can use the following bbCode
[i], [b], [img], [quote], [url href="http://www.google.com/"]Google[/url]

Leave a Reply

PC Gaming Calendar 2014

Follow Games.on.net

YouTube

Steam Group

Upcoming Games

Community Soapbox

Recent Features
EA Access

EA Access isn’t perfect, but get used to it: This is just the beginning

Other major publishers will be watching with interest as EA offers the first subscription service.

Destiny

Destiny continues to impress in beta: Our thoughts as Bungie’s new juggernaut rolls on

It's clear that Bungie are putting their best foot forward with Destiny, but as James discovers, playing on your own can be strangely empty.

Screencheat

Five Australian Indie Games We’d Hand Arbitrary Awards To: AVCon 2014

From a split-screen shooter where everyone is invisible to an abandoned space station, Australian indies are killing it at this year's AVCon.

Streaming Radio
Radio Streams are restricted to iiNet group customers.

GreenManGaming MREC

Facebook Like Box