SimCity beta impressions: Rebirthing city-building for a new generation

SimCity Beta

By on January 29, 2013 at 1:20 pm

I found the SimCity beta invitation that arrived in my inbox last week to be quite a bittersweet occasion. I’ve mentioned here before that SimCity was the most exciting release of the year for me, thanks to the promised overhaul of traditional mechanics and systems within the shiny new GlassBox engine. Years of substandard copycats, full of ambition yet completely rubbish at converting it into playable form (hey there, Cities XL), tended to miss the point of what made the original Sim City so spectacular.

It wasn’t just about developing ridiculously sprawling cities, full of 86 different forms of transport, nor was it about ridiculously complex and expensive water pipelines. It was about the perfect whole; creating a city that organically grew around your choices, balancing the books and keeping your people happy. While I only had an hour to preview the changes, I came away not only impressed but a little disappointed that some of the more heavily touted multiplayer options were not available to test.

It was unfortunate that EA, for some reason that I can’t begin to fathom, decided to place heavily restrictive conditions on this particular beta period.

First of all, the period was only 3 days long — which wouldn’t have been such a problem, except for the fact that you could only play a very limited set of parameters for one hour. So while it was great to experience many of the bells and whistles we’d all become teased and tantalized with via the various development videos released over the past few months, the portion of the title that would have benefited the most from a beta test wasn’t even available. Regions, first introduced in Sim City 4, have been thoughtfully expanded into an integral part of the game, pushing SimCity into MMORTS territory and almost forcing players to collaborate (or compete) with other cities created by other players or themselves.

Both the tutorial and the free-play modes refer constantly to all of the potentially cool and interesting new possibilities of these features… but then forbid you from actually testing any of them.

Fortunately, what you are able to do in the hour provided is play one of the most refined, streamlined and clever interpretations of a city sim since, well, the original. While the original core elements still exist, from RCI to the various transport and power options, many of the bugbears that plagued both casual and hardcore players alike have been given a much needed work-over  No longer do you need to spend hours underground, piecing convoluted water grids together, attempting to wrangle highway chunks or digging subway trenches that end up coming expensive white elephants.

Roads, as they are in reality, become the veins of your city, automatically carrying everything from power to sewage, removing the need to create pointless overhead power lines (almost obsolete in most modern cities) or sanitation systems. Instead, the onus turns to the cultivation and conservation of those resources, from creating the correct placement for wind power, finding a coal supply or a continual source of clean water.

It’s a radical change of pace, and one that will probably upset a lot of long term players, especially those that found an almost masochistic pleasure in developing the same grids that I despised. Much of the budgetary issues that prevented many players from enjoying earlier titles were due to the obscene cost and “no going back” permanency of those investments, and the change from grid maintenance to concentrating on the things that matter, like the safety, education and economic success of your citizens, is very welcome. The big changes continue with the new zoning system, that allows free cultivation of Residential, Commercial or Industrial properties, again, removing budgetary problem stemming from early misplacement of growth, but at the same time, a lot of the difficulty that came with the decision of placement.

But that’s not to say that SimCity still isn’t hard, especially as your population expands — but these changes have made it significantly more accessible to new and casual players. These changes come with a distinct price, however, and that is the drastic shift to the importance of road placement, city specialization and building placement.

Government is now an industry of its own, and the placement of important buildings can not only unlock certain financial benefits, but features that improve the wealth of citizens or transport capabilities. Roads are now obscenely expensive, due to the reduction in cost of the now automated mechanics, and are now the primary factor in how your city will live or die. Go cheap on roads, and your essential utilities will not route correctly. Build plants and towers too far away from your populace and they won’t reach many citizens. Put fire, ambulance and police stations too far out or create poor road networks and the cars will get stuck in traffic or simply too long to get where they are needed. Not only that, but special buildings are significantly more expensive, and can be the catalyst to an advanced, successful metropolis or a crime ridden backwater.

The jury is out on whether many gamers will find the game is “too” simplified. Sure, there’s less of an emphasis on charts and numbers, but they are still there, just in places where they actually matter (like surplus power or water, for instance, or how many ambulances you have and their response times). Your city is stuck within a 2x2km grid, but this is due to EA’s decision to shift the focus to the much more accessible region system — although, as previously mentioned, I wasn’t able to see how this actually worked, or if this negated the loss of a sprawling metropolis.

But at the same time, with our planet becoming more focused on tighter, more urban spaces, consider: is sprawl itself a mechanic, like overhead powerlines, that is obsolete? Is Maxis possibility trying to get us to change our minds on how cities should interact with one another, sharing resources and specializing in particular industry that complements its neighbours? Hell, even their Education mechanics state that a schooled citizen is much less likely to “get injured, commit a crime or start a fire”. There is a lot more to this game than a little tidbit scraped off the surface and stuffed into an hour block.

I loved SimCity, and I’m more excited than ever to check out the final product in March. However, beta restrictions meant many of the other more interesting changes, like city specializations, are barely covered outside aspects of the “Gambling” option, which while fun was neutered to seemingly offer only the benefits and none of the disadvantages. It also was obvious how integral the multiplayer is once the hour was over: looking at my barely developed city, it was almost begging for some kind of partner or influence to help it become something special or unique.

It was honestly surprising that so little was offered in the only chance before final press access to make an wholesome impression, but, to be fair, I enjoyed every single second of it. Welcome back, SimCity. We missed you.

16 comments (Leave your own)

Do want


Not going to get it to be honest, beta sucked personally and the game is very dumbed down, not to mention crappy graphics even 100% maxed out, doesn’t show that well for a game made for 2013, and its tech

James Pinnell

Not going to get it to be honest, beta sucked personally and the game is very dumbed down, not to mention crappy graphics even 100% maxed out, doesn’t show that well for a game made for 2013, and its tech

I attribute a lot of the blurry and low res to the fact that it’s a beta. I don’t think its dumbed down, I think they just held way too much back in the beta – none of the advanced objectives or challenges were there, it was just early game.


Glad I didn’t take part in the Beta now, would have been underwhelming. Can’t wait to see what the full release is like in March :)


My mate got into the Closed Beta despite not even signing up, lol. The game itself was enjoyable, however, I was disappointed with the whole 1 hour time limit; it’s a beta not a goddamn demo. And the more annoying thing was every time I closed the game it would open up the SimCity/Origin store web site to buy it. Only asked me for feedback the 1st time I played it. I think it was more of a marketing test than a beta test


Oh god, sounds horrible.

“Accessible”… tiny city space… gah.

Sprawl might be something to strive against, but it still happens, and should still be part of a real city simulator.

Ditto power lines etc – if cities currently have these things (which they do) then they should be in the game.

And cities do have to manage their infrastructure, so why take that out of the game?

Coupled with always-on mega DRM and enforced region play and… BOO!

I wish EA could use their fancy new engine to let me play single player in a massive area of land while micromanaging to my heart’s content.


I still don’t get why always on DRM is an issue. You can get an internet connection on your phone that is faster than dsl was 7 years ago… So what’s the problem?


I still don’t get why always on DRM is an issue. You can get an internet connection on your phone that is faster than dsl was 7 years ago… So what’s the problem?

Two things:

Firstly, always on DRM may be fine if you have a stable connection, but if not, you run into trouble. The fact that EA are having issues at their data center, or are overloaded on launch day (see Diablo 3 troubles), or work is going on at my internet exchange, shouldn’t affect me playing what is ostensibly a single player game.

Secondly, there are no save games. You can’t go back if you screw up, and you can’t unleash a disaster on your city to see what happens and reload.

In exchange, you’re getting a few things:

-Reduced (but of course, never eliminated) piracy
-Cloud saves – You could in theory, play wherever you are, or reload if you lost a hard drive
-Multiplayer/Social aspects

It doesn’t really seem worth it to me, even though my connection is stable, and I’m interested to see what the multiplayer brings.

I guess if you look at what it is, it’s pretty good, and I’ll likely shell out for it anyway, but it’s disappointing. It didn’t need to be this way.


I still don’t get why always on DRM is an issue. You can get an internet connection on your phone that is faster than dsl was 7 years ago… So what’s the problem?

That people don’t want to have to have the permission of some random company to play games they have paid for?

That people don’t want to be exposed to the type of arbitrary termination of access to multiple games as was possible under the beta agreement for this very game?

That just because something is technically feasible doesn’t make it right?

That these companies give us no information about what they actually collect or how they use it?

That internet connections do go down and making a game which would work perfectly well offline dependent on an internet connection at all times is a terrible design decision?

That games requiring online connectivity will inevitably be switched off one day in order to force you to buy the new version, or simply because the company feels like it?

That DRM assists in unfair price discrimination?

I could go on…



Yeah that’s great – when your net actually works. You apparently don’t live in Central Queensland at the moment, where due to storm activity internet has been down across the entire area more than its been up. It’s been dropping in and out in a terrible fashion, here in Rocky it’s been a case of we’re lucky if we can use eftpos, let alone log on and enjoy a agame. It seems to be stabilizing now, but any game that required a persistent connection pretty much became unplayable.

So yes, combined with the above reasons, always on DRM is, and always will be an issue.


Funny, Facebook has always on DRM, you must connected to the internet. So does DOTA 2. You may argue they need internet to actually work socially and with multiplayer. But for me, if the internet is down, the power may as well be out, coz there is nothing to do on your computer without it these days….

James Pinnell

I agree with bennbill – while the idea of always on DRM isn’t particularly appealing, it’s hardly a problem 99% of the time since you’re online 99.9% of the time.

I find it hard pressed to bother using my PC if there is no connection – I’d rather read a book or go out.


I agree it’s an issue for what essentially WAS a single player game. I don’t believe the new Simcity is a singleplayer game anymore though. It’s becoming a multiplayer game with the region focus. Obviously it was lacking in the beta though!


I find it hard pressed to bother using my PC if there is no connection – I’d rather read a book or go out.

Isn’t that sort of the point – whether you have a connection or not shouldn’t affect your ability to use your PC, other than for online-only activities.


caitsith01: Isn’t that sort of the point – whether you have a connection or not shouldn’t affect your ability to use your PC, other than for online-only activities.

But that’s the point, Maxis want to move this into the multiplayer sphere, as opposed to the closest town planner :P They’re trying to push it in a new direction and as long as the promises are lived up to, I think it’ll be great :D Don’t stress though, it’ll be modded beyond belief in a couple of years and you can buy in then ;)



It’s called a BETA for a reason….

Leave a comment

You can use the following bbCode
[i], [b], [img], [quote], [url href=""]Google[/url]

Leave a Reply



Steam Group

Upcoming Games

Community Soapbox

Recent Features logo

Announcement: website closure

Website and forums to shut down on November 30.

Life Is Strange

Life is Strange complete season review: Your move, Telltale Games

The year's most heartwrenching game comes to an emotional conclusion.

Halo 5: Guardians

Halo 5 Guardians review: A boring game and a broken promise

343 Industries are back again with Halo -- but maybe they should have left it alone, says Joab.

The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt

The Witcher 3: Hearts of Stone is a proper, old-school expansion

From a drunk, possessed Geralt to a battle against an enormous toad, Hearts of Stone delivers.

Streaming Radio
Radio Streams are restricted to iiNet group customers.

GreenManGaming MREC

Facebook Like Box