Blizzard reject accusations of Activision interference in game design

Bobby Kotick

Much like it’s popular to blame EA for things you don’t like about BioWare, it’s long been popular to shift the blame to Activision when Blizzard make an unpopular move. Blizzard have had enough of that though, and spoke out overnight on a Reddit AMA thread about World of Warcraft.

Director Tom Chilton was asked: “”As the people designing the game, do you feel there has been a change in how things are done since the merger [between Blizzard and Activision], either within game development or the company in general?”

He responded unequivocally. “I’ll come out and say it. Activision gets an unfair reputation among our players for this, as does Bobby Kotick. We do demos for the Activision executive team about twice per year (sometimes only once). They ask intelligent questions about why we’re doing what we’re doing, but at no point have any mandates (or even “suggestions”) about the game’s design been issued.”

Slammin’.

Source: PCGamesN

12 comments (Leave your own)

it feels like the Activision argument comes out when gamers “accuse” Blizzard of trying to make money.

this always makes me laugh.

 

So don’t blame Activision for what Blizzard has done, blame Blizzard…

OK then?

 
 

Great so it’s Blizzard going straight down the toilet then. Sigh.

 

skitzor:
it feels like the Activision argument comes out when gamers “accuse” Blizzard of trying to make money.

this always makes me laugh.

Yeah, just like it’s EA’s fault for DICE’s fuck ups with battlefield.

I don’t have an issue with blaming someone, but blame the right someone.

 

To me that question seemed carefully answered and avoided in a way. From someone who has been playing WoW since vanilla beta, SC2 and D3 I have definitely noticed a decline in their quality.

I’ve said before somewhere on GoN that after blizz merged with activision they dropped their whole “it will be done when it’s done” attitude and started rushing their releases.

If it were true that activision has “basically” nothing to do with blizzard apart from the “executive demos” then really what was the point of the merger in the first place?

 

somexspec,

You do realise blizzard had originally planned to release diablo III in 2011 right? Then they decided to do some major changes to the game.

 

somexspec,

I have to strongly disagree with you about SC2, as I’m sure the general SC2 community past and present. D3 I do agree with.

I want to clear something up about the merger, because there are a TON of misconceptions on every site I visit. Vivendi owns both Activision and Blizzard. Vivendi acquired Activision and merged it with Vivendi Games. Blizzard remained a separate entity with completely independent management.

ActivisionBlizzard is the holding company. Vivendi is the parent company. Blizzard presents demos to Activision because Bobby Kotick needs to know what the hell is going on for business reasons. He does not have the authority to tell Blizzard management what to do – that’s a fact. Vivendi can tell Blizzard what to do. Activision has as much control over Blizzard as Blizzard has control over Activision — Read: none.

There’s no sudden decline in Blizzard games, nor are they becoming rushed (D3 took forever and a year, and Heart of the Swarm is following the same timeline). SC2 was/is the best RTS there is. WoW, despite being 8 years old, is still a smash hit. D3, regardless of its commercial success (due to hype IMO) is the only Blizzard game that I would call subpar, and I place the blame squarely on the development team. They’ve improved it drastically with 1.04, but it still has a ways to go.

 

SC2 is a remake of SC. It failed to advance the genre in anyway and is quite literally a 3D skin for a 2D game that for some reason got popular when there were FAR better RTS games about (Total Annihilation anyone…). The fact it brought nothing new to the table to me makes the game an utter failure and a cash in on everyone who eagerly awaited something new.

D3 was just awful unfortunately. I played through to the end once just to see if it had learn’t it’s lessons. It’s not on my HD any more as it hadn’t learn’t…

WoW is still popular for some unknown reason. There are many reasons some other MMO’s should be as successful or moreso than WoW but they aren’t because of familiarity rather than loyalty. People like familiarity and WoW provides that for them. Kudos to Blizzard for supporting it for so long. Slap Blizzard in the face for caving to the demands of the vocal maggots.

In the end Activision are hard at work screwing everyone over with their IP’s, while Blizzard is just doing the same with their own. Apparently the management don’t have drinks and cats on their laps while discussing how to do it together :D

 

somexspec:
To me that question seemed carefully answered and avoided in a way. From someone who has been playing WoW since vanilla beta, SC2 and D3 I have definitely noticed a decline in their quality.

I’ve said before somewhere on GoN that after blizz merged with activision they dropped their whole “it will be done when it’s done” attitude and started rushing their releases.

If it were true that activision has “basically” nothing to do with blizzard apart from the “executive demos” then really what was the point of the merger in the first place?

money

 

somexspec: To me that question seemed carefully answered and avoided in a way.

I think you have some serious trust issues. As it is you’re just flat out calling Tom Chilton a liar.

 

chrisn,

I couldn’t disagree with you more if I was paid.

 
Leave a comment

You can use the following bbCode
[i], [b], [img], [quote], [url href="http://www.google.com/"]Google[/url]

Leave a Reply

Follow Games.on.net

Steam Group

Subscribe

Subscribe

Stay updated and get games.on.net delivered daily to your inbox!

Email:

Upcoming Games

Releasing Soon
Dead Island: Riptide Metro: Last Light Company of Heroes 2

Community Soapbox

Recent Features
Civilization V: Brave New World

Hands-on with Civilization V’s Brave New World expansion

James tries to recreate the rise and fall of the Mayans in Civ V's new expansion.

Gigabyte Metro Last Light Comp

Gear up for the Metro with Gigabyte! Win yourself a new GTX660 and more

Crush the mutants into submission with these new tools. Click here and enter!

Vireio Perception

Vireio Perception vs. Oculus Rift: An open letter to Nate Mitchell

The developers behind open-source Oculus Rift drivers take issue with Nate Mitchell's claims.

Metro: Last Light

Metro: Last Light reviewed (PC) – A beautiful post-apocalyptic prima donna

Metro is beautiful, but is too in love with itself to let you play it. Watch the video review inside.

Streaming Radio
Radio Streams are restricted to iiNet group customers.

GreenManGaming MREC

The Regulars
Windows 8.1

Friday Tech Roundup (17 May 2013): Windows 8.1 is almost upon us

Plus, Google CEO says "don't be evil" was "stupid", and the $325,000 in-vitro burger.

Clive Barker's Jericho

Sitrep: A Troubled Romance with Clive Barker’s Jericho

Toby's guilty pleasure is this atrociously designed FPS.

Binary Domain

You Know What I Love? Rough Games

Brendan explains how sometimes it's better to try for something new than polish something old.

7GHz Haswell Processor

Friday Tech Roundup (10 May 2013): Would you like a 7GHz processor?

Plus quantum internet a reality, and the open-source gun controller.

Facebook Like Box

Friends of games.on.net