Hardware Review: Razer Blackshark BF3 Edition Headphones

Razer Blackshark BF3 Edition Headphones

Even though Battlefield 3 has been out for nearly nine months, Razer are just releasing their new ‘Blackshark’ Battlefield 3 edition gaming headphones. With a rugged, “military-inspired” exposed-wire design and some sleek black-and-orange colouring, they’ve an impressive looking piece of kit. But do they stand up in the crowded gaming headset market? We took them for a spin to find out.

Specs:

  • Price: $164.95
  • Weight: 290g
  • Drivers: 40mm neodymium magnet stereo with copper-clad aluminum voice coil
  • Frequency response: 20Hz – 20KHz
  • Impedance: 29 Ω
  • Sensitivity @ 1KHz: 105dB ± 3 dB
  • Input power: 50mW
  • Cable: 1.3m rubber sheathed
  • Connector: 3.5 mm audio + mic combined jack

Construction

The first thing you notice about the BF3 Blackshark is, naturally, the construction. With exposed orange wires running everywhere, it’s a far cry from the usual setup of most gaming headsets who try to tuck everything neatly away – with the unfortunate consequence of making it difficult (if not impossible) to tell when or where something is busted. This is not a problem you’ll experience with the BF3 Blackshark, as every wire is visible right from the get go.

Although you might not think so from the appearance, the BF3 Blackshark is a well-constructed kit, and feels solid in the hands and on the head. At nearly 300 grams it’s a little on the heavy side, probably due to the large amount of metal in the build, but it’s comfortable on the skull and certainly not a problem to wear for hours at a stretch.

The ear cups are supposedly “inspired by those found on headsets worn by real pilots”, but realistically they’re a little on the skinny side for my elphantine ears, and aren’t as fully enclosing as I would like if I were an actual pilot. I found it difficult to really filter outside noise while wearing them, and wouldn’t recommend them for use in a gaming environment with a lot of background noise – but your mileage (and ear size) may vary.

Sound quality

Inside the ear cups themselves are a pair of 40mm neodymium magnet stereo speakers, one in each cup. The BF3 Blackshark is limited to stereo sound only, which seems bizarre as the audio environment of Battlefield 3 is designed from the ground-up to reward the careful listener and work hand-in-hand with surround sound. Regardless, with bass enhancement on the speakers the BF3 Blackshark is certainly a pleasant listening experience, with good depth on most applications. If you want to listen to music, you can even detach the boom mic and take the BF3 Blackshark on the bus with you, if you’re into that sort of thing.

The BF3 Blackshark connects with a standard 3.5mm audio jack, coming with a single audio + mic combined jack as well as an enclosed splitter. The splitter effectively doubles the length of the cord, and seems like a natural attachment for most gamers. As the Blackshark is stereo sound only, there’s no requirement for any drivers or anything to install, which means setup is quick and easy.

The unfortunate downside of that quick and easy setup is because the headset lacks any real audio tweaking features, or even onboard volume or microphone control. Where other headsets – even other Razer brand options – might offer a volume control on the headset itself or a mic-mute switch on the cable somewhere, the BF3 Blackshark relies on you to adjust your computer’s volume instead. This is a frustrating decision from Razer and it is strange that the BF3 Blackshark is missing what is essentially an expected feature of nearly every gaming headset.

Conclusion

At an AU RRP of $164.95, the Battlefield 3 Blackshark may come with a code to get you an exclusive in-game ‘Hydra’ dog tag, but it’s a a good $60-70 more than you’ll pay for other headphones which actually have more functionality. With Turtle Beach, Plantronics, Astro, and even Razer themselves offering headphones in the $70 – $100 range, the only real quality that the BF3 Blackshark offers over the competition is the ruggedly excellent exposed-wire design.

If Razer could combine that build quality with the simple addition of volume and mic controls, or even the inclusion of emulated 7.1 surround sound, this would be a much more tempting purchase. As it is, the BF3 Blackshark seems to be a headset that only the fans will be willing to shell out for.

Good:

  • Exposed wire construction is durable and customisable
  • Good sound quality with excellent bass, comfortable earcups
  • Detachable boom mic, because why not

Bad:

  • Stereo sound only, not ideal for Battlefield 3
  • No volume control on headset, or mic mute button
  • Lacking in features that other gaming headsets provide
26 comments (Leave your own)

Emulated 5.1 or 7.1 surround is a joke, and I’m disgusted to see you demand it from gaming headphones…

 

A joke? I’ve enjoyed it from headphones in the past, and certainly as somebody who doesn’t have the desk space for a proper surround setup, it’s been of great help to me in various TF2 matches.

 

Emulated 5.1 and 7.1 sound is really something coming from the sound card, so you can’t expect it from non-USB headphones. I agree it’s nice but you can’t demand it from something that has no right actually providing that functionality.

 

stereo with 7.1 input and decent speakers beat a emulated setup or even those headphones with more then one speaker; the quality of sound is what you need, the 7.1 sound input sorts itself out. My AD700s i use in stereo but with TF2 set to output 7.1 i can easily distinguish directional sound without sacrificing audio quality. That is what would make me buy these headphones as they sound like they are maximising sound quality instead of gimmicky ‘directional’ audio. Also i have compared to my Xonar 5.1 and 7.1 dolby headphone emulations and they muddle it up too much, with either sacrifice of quality or weird echos.

 

wmc90:
Emulated 5.1 and 7.1 sound is really something coming from the sound card, so you can’t expect it from non-USB headphones. I agree it’s nice but you can’t demand it from something that has no right actually providing that functionality.

Oh, for sure – but for the price tag, and for a ‘Battlefield 3′ brand, it would have been nice of Razer to move up to USB headphones and offer that functionality.

 
James Pinnell

Emulated surround is a pretty common feature nowadays, especially when you are comparing these (quite expensive) headphones against other premium models with extra features.

 

wmc90:
Emulated 5.1 and 7.1 sound is really something coming from the sound card, so you can’t expect it from non-USB headphones. I agree it’s nice but you can’t demand it from something that has no right actually providing that functionality.

“3.5 mm computer headsets connect to the computer via a soundcard, which converts the digital signal of the computer to an analog signal for the headset. USB computer headsets connect to the computer via a USB port, and the audio conversion occurs in the headset or in the control unit of the headset.”

I’m not an audiophile at all, but I’m fairly certain there’s a lot of bullshit being thrown around here by people seeking to justify the pricetag of an auditory placebo effect.

 

emulated 5.1 in my senhessiers are amazing

having a jet fly overhead is just….wow

 

Tim Colwill: Oh, for sure – but for the price tag, and for a ‘Battlefield 3′ brand, it would have been nice of Razer to move up to USB headphones and offer that functionality.

But they already have that function with their Megalodon for roughly the same price. These headphones are designed to compete in the gaming market with steelseries, with audio quality over surround emulation. I am almost considering getting these as some people are saying they outperform steelseries’ 7H and i want a headset with mic.

 

instinx: But they already have that function with their Megalodon for roughly the same price. These headphones are designed to compete in the gaming market with steelseries, with audio quality over surround emulation. I am almost considering getting these as some people are saying they outperform steelseries’ 7H and i want a headset with mic.

There’s no denying that the sound quality on them is excellent, but if they can put emulated 7.1 in there, why wouldn’t they? It seems like you’re paying the same price for less functionality. Is the sound quality on the Megalodon really bad? I haven’t used it, but the emulated surround headphones I have used have had just as good sound quality as the Blackshark offers.

 

The problem i have with all the higher end is, besides Steelseries, i need to look at lower end gaming headphones or low end audiophile headphones if i want to utilize my soundcard. As i said these headphones are in direct competition against steelseries 7Hs (and also their Siberias, another 2.0 headset) which are widely popular in competitive gaming. When EA showcased their BF3 before release they had Astros hooked up to the PCs which are 2.0 headsets as well as i cannot remember seeing their USB soundcards on the table. This is a small section of the gaming community, i agree, but without a (relatively) high end 2.0 headset they are loosing customers.

 

20Hz – 20KHz? very average

 

So far, I havn’t found a headset to surpass Tritton ax-pro’s.

 

I don’t understand why they can’t just make a headphone that has decent sound quality AND emulated surround… I also don’t understand why a gamer, buying a gaming headset would look for better quality base over surround sound capability?

Having never used surround sound before until 2 weeks ago I can honestly say I would never (given the choice) play another shooter without it ever again, and it’s easy to just flick a switch and turn it off when I want to watch something that requires sound quality.

Emulation might not be as great as real surround sound, but it’s sure as hell better than stereo and for $170 worth of gaming headset I’d want to be getting it.

 

BOO there’s no edit feature…

Another note though: you left out the most important part of a headset review, what sort of cable does it have? I don’t care about sound quality or comfort if $170 is going to buy me some plastic sleeved junk that will break after 2 months becasue the cord is the thickness of a pin.

 

nekosan:
Another note though: you left out the most important part of a headset review, what sort of cable does it have? I don’t care about sound quality or comfort if $170 is going to buy me some plastic sleeved junk that will break after 2 months becasue the cord is the thickness of a pin.

Sure thing! Cables are rubber-sleeved in orange and about 4mm thick across.

 

I’ve always found Razer gear to sit uncomfortably, so I moved to my Sennheiser G4ME PC360 headset, I usually forget that I’m wearing it. The sound quality is great and the mic is crisp and clear.

 

akira675,

Yeh, where did my edit go?
The Sennheiser’s I might add, auto mute the microphone when you put it back into the vertical position and have a volume adjuster on the right earpiece.

http://en-de.sennheiser.com/pc-360

 
 

Why anyone would pay so much for these crappy “gaming” headphones is beyond me. For the same price you can get a pair of AD-700s + a zalman clip on mic.

 

I’ll stick with my G35.

- Cheaper
- Nice sound quality
- 7.1 (it really makes a difference, which is easily noticable when switching it of)
- Automutes the mic in vertical position
- Mutebutton on the left earpiece
- Volume control on the left earpiece
- 3 macrobuttons on the left earpiece
- Tiny LED on the tip of the mic, that indicates when it is muted
- Very durable fabriccable
- Exchangable cushions in different sizes

It has almost every feature you could possibly want from a gaming headset. ^^

 

monkb:
http://headphones.com.au/psingle?productID=180

plus

http://www.pccasegear.com/index.php?main_page=product_info&cPath=211&products_id=13280

its all you will ever need !#@$

I have a Xonar Essence STX with my headphones as well.. I second this comment.

 

Well that recview oretty much kills any chance of peole buying these, and that’s a shame because they look great.

I use Turtle Beach X-41′s. The faux-7.1 Surround Sound is at its best with BF3… the fidelity, volume and positional audio is freakishly good. Battery life is excellent too and it’s so nice to crank the sound while relaxing on the couch if your family/flatmates are trying to sleep.

 

The frequency response & impedance is pretty average really.

 

$124 for people in the USA, $164 for Australians, sigh…

 

The whole ‘gaming headset’ thing is rubbish. Any serious gamer who has even a small clue about real sound will throw these in the garbage, jump online and buy a pair of AD700/900′s and a Xonar STX soundcard. That relatively cheap setup will sound far better than rip-offs like these ever will.

 
Leave a comment

You can use the following bbCode
[i], [b], [img], [quote], [url href="http://www.google.com/"]Google[/url]

Leave a Reply

Follow Games.on.net

Steam Group

Subscribe

Subscribe

Stay updated and get games.on.net delivered daily to your inbox!

Email:

Upcoming Games

Releasing Soon
Dead Island: Riptide Metro: Last Light Company of Heroes 2

Community Soapbox

Recent Features
Civilization V: Brave New World

Hands-on with Civilization V’s Brave New World expansion

James tries to recreate the rise and fall of the Mayans in Civ V's new expansion.

Gigabyte Metro Last Light Comp

Gear up for the Metro with Gigabyte! Win yourself a new GTX660 and more

Crush the mutants into submission with these new tools. Click here and enter!

Vireio Perception

Vireio Perception vs. Oculus Rift: An open letter to Nate Mitchell

The developers behind open-source Oculus Rift drivers take issue with Nate Mitchell's claims.

Metro: Last Light

Metro: Last Light reviewed (PC) – A beautiful post-apocalyptic prima donna

Metro is beautiful, but is too in love with itself to let you play it. Watch the video review inside.

Streaming Radio
Radio Streams are restricted to iiNet group customers.

GreenManGaming MREC

The Regulars
Windows 8.1

Friday Tech Roundup (17 May 2013): Windows 8.1 is almost upon us

Plus, Google CEO says "don't be evil" was "stupid", and the $325,000 in-vitro burger.

Clive Barker's Jericho

Sitrep: A Troubled Romance with Clive Barker’s Jericho

Toby's guilty pleasure is this atrociously designed FPS.

Binary Domain

You Know What I Love? Rough Games

Brendan explains how sometimes it's better to try for something new than polish something old.

7GHz Haswell Processor

Friday Tech Roundup (10 May 2013): Would you like a 7GHz processor?

Plus quantum internet a reality, and the open-source gun controller.

Facebook Like Box

Friends of games.on.net